![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let's not turn this into a flame war; I simply want to get a discussion
going on this. Also note that I am not yet a pilot, and I'm hoping to learn something out of this. You stated: "After a few calls from FSS when I forgot to close my VFR flight plan..." By this reasoning, it would be appropriate for one to just make ALL of their landings "wheels up" because they from time to time forgot to verify that check list item. Over the years, I have read many statements where pilots stopped filing flight plans because they kept forgetting to close them. IMHO, this indicates a somewhat lackadaisical attitude. If they forget to close their flight plan, what else are they forgetting to do? I have often heard that "the flight ain't over 'til the wheels are on the ground and the prop's stopped turning." A CFI friend of mind always added "and the flight plan is closed". Would it perhaps be better, instead of simply abandoning a safety measure because one forgets to properly use it, to develop the routine required to properly use the safety measure? TIA for your opinions... "Peter R." wrote in message ... Jay Beckman wrote: That's my take on this too. IMO, it's "uber efficient" when dealing with a bug-smashing C172 just out for a breakfast run like I was this morning. Do you file a VFR flight plan for all of your VFR flights (excluding pattern work, of course)? After a few calls from FSS when I forgot to close my VFR flight plan, I sided with many in this group who advocated only filing a VFR FP when flying out of radar coverage which, in my case, only applied when I was flying up to the Adirondack mountains of NY state. In all other cases, I rationalized that flying with flight following in radar coverage negated the value of a VFR flight plan. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bush's Attempt to Usurp the Constitution | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 20 | July 2nd 04 05:09 PM |
| Geeting Around Company Policy - Part 2 | Iain Wilson | Piloting | 7 | June 22nd 04 10:43 PM |
| Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 06:09 AM |
| No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 10th 04 12:25 AM |
| No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 08:31 PM |