A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Victor Airways in Clearance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32  
Old February 13th 04, 10:34 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message =
...
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:34:37 GMT, "John R. Copeland"
wrote:
=20
A disappointment in the CNX80 is in navigating to a distant VOR.
No matter how far away, it displays the fixed inbound VOR radial,
but calls it "Bearing to Waypoint".
In truth, it becomes the bearing only when you are near the VOR.
All other types of waypoints always display the correct great-circle =

bearing.

The manual (pg.13) implies this VOR behavior exists only for OBS =

mode,
but it's the case in any mode whenever a VOR is the current waypoint.

I received a private communication to the effect that they will make =

the
manual agree with the CNX80's behavior instead of fixing the problem.

My work-around is to create a User Waypoint at the same Lat/Lon
as any distant VOR I want to navigate toward.
I regret needing to do that.

I was told this choice was forced upon GarminAT by outside =

influences.
It was not the choice of GarminAT engineering.

I really hope they will find some compromise which will allow VORs
to become useful as waypoints. Right now, they are not.
Perhaps it could help if more CNX80 users told GarminAT they'd like
to navigate toward distant VORs.
---JRC---

=20
John,
=20
I've finally had some time to play with my new CNX80 as well as the
simulator recently posted on their web site. And I'd like to add a =

few
things to your observation, and possibly a different work-around.
=20
As I played with things more and more, I decided that I'm actually OK =

with
how it works!
=20
1. As you note, the "Bearing" on Map 1 represents the final course to =

the
VOR. However, (I think this next is true) since VOR radials follow a =

great
circle route, it also represents the VOR radial (reciprocal, actually) =

that
you would be flying were you to be navigating to that VOR.
=20
2. The CNX80 will still navigate along the Great Circle route. So, =

for
example, if I were to set up a flight plan from my home base (KEPM) to =

the
POMona VOR (NE of KLAX), the "Bearing" on Map 1 is 224=B0 but my =

actual
course, at the beginning of the flight, will be 291=B0.
=20
3. You can customize one of the other pages to show the Desired Track =

(DTK)
which will, indeed, be 291=B0 when starting out.
=20
But thanks for bringing up the point. It got me thinking about things =

I
might not otherwise have considered in using this box.
=20
=20
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)


Ron, I'm happy to hear you like your CNX80. I like mine, also.

Everything you said about the VOR radials is correct.
In fact, GarminAT released CNX80 newsletter #3 this very day.
It contains a discussion of the VOR bearing/radial situation.
It is substantially identical to information I previously received in a
private communication from them.

Regarding the choice of displaying DTK on a custom map page,
I believe that will not show the current bearing to waypoint under the
circumstance of having been vectored far enough away from course
that the bearing then differs from the DTK.
If I'm then re-cleared direct to the next waypoint, I've always liked
seeing the correct bearing display without needing to punch any buttons.

Furthermore, my MX20 has a prominent display of that "Bearing" number,
which becomes the VOR radial reciprocal, too.
I haven't seen a way to change that MX20 field to the DTK.
But it's no big deal. I can cope with it, too.

Did you find that bad spot in missed approaches on the Windows =
simulator?
---JRC---

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 195 November 28th 05 11:06 PM
Comm1 IFR and Departure Clearance Training FOR SALE Curtis Instrument Flight Rules 0 November 13th 03 09:26 PM
required readback on clearance [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 15 September 17th 03 05:33 PM
Picking up a Clearance Airborne Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 03 02:31 AM
Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance) Badwater Bill Home Built 27 August 21st 03 01:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.