![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Juan Jimenez wrote:
Like I said, I believe you should have the gumption to talk to Jim and get his side of the story. Until you do that, all you're doing is blowing more hot air of the RAH gaggle type. ![]() Juan, it is interesting that you suggest talking to Jim. I have had the pleasure, so I have passed your hot air test. I spoke to Jim, when he called me on my cell phone early one Sunday morning. I ended up getting his side of a number of his "stories" in the course of this 60+ minute conversation. During this phone call, I was lectured and threatened and was party to both sides of the good cop bad cop routine. After I advised a British aviation magazine to check out Jim's credentials a little more carefully before accepting his contributions, that same magazine provided Jim with my email message and cell phone number. This says something about that magazine's integrity. A good part of the conversation centered around his test pilot experience and credentials and his general credibility. He pleasantly asked me to publicly and privately retract my statements. When I told him that I wasn't especially interested in retracting my statements, he turned up the heat and started making legal threats. Without getting upset, I told Jim that I would take my chances in court if that is what he wanted to do. I told him that it would be interesting to witness my father's testimony and that of dozens of Navy test pilots echoing my interpretation of Jim's claims and credentials. When I mentioned that given his medical history and public record of his activities, he might be at a disadvantage facing me in court. He kept switching characters, a few minutes good cop, a few minutes bad cop. He would threaten legal action, explaining the consequences of his legal victory and in the next breath, start crying about how such statements are hurting his ability to provide for himself and his family and nicely asking me to retract the statements or cease making further statements of that nature. Well, Juan, that's my experience with Jim. He's a train wreck and you invite criticism through your association with him. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 07:58 PM |
| millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 6th 04 12:14 AM |
| Zoom fables on ANN ZZZZZZZZZZZZ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 49 | July 22nd 04 07:06 PM |
| Zzzz Campbell's Second Lawsuit Against Sun-N-Fun Zzzz | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | October 6th 03 03:09 PM |