![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The flying wing has some horizontal momentum which is secondary here,
How much? mv The air thrown forward (or, if you will, the higher pressure ahead) tries to reduce that, the engine presumably makes up for it. Energy is 'pumped' into the air by the plane. Yes, and what form does that energy take? I maintain that it takes the form of a net increase in mv^2/2 over all the air molecules. Since m doesn't change, and 2 only changes in a pentium, that leaves v to change. This changes mv, thus momentum. We agree that there is (microsocopic) momentum transfer at each collision. We disagree as to whether the net is zero, and I think that part of that disagreement has to do with just how much of the system we are looking at. The wing throws air down. If that causes other air to be squeezed up, so be it - the wing will grab that air and throw it down again. The air piles up in front of and below the wing, and ultimately pushes on the earth. New (undisturbed) air keeps appearing in front of the wing (where it is pushed up, and then back down). But if, instead of feeding this system fresh air, we instead feed it the same air, say, by flying around in circles, there will be a net movement of air. Air will be sucked from the (infinite amount of) air above, and pushed down into the (infinite volume of) air below. The next time the wing encounters this area, there will already be downward movement of air from the first passage... etc. etc. and so forth. Momentum is conserved in elastic collisions Low speed collisions between air molecules and aluminum sheets are to first order elastic (although some energy goes into making molecules wiggle and spin, and I suppose an electron is knocked out every now and again). Roll the airplane into a 90 degree bank. The weight is now orthogonal to the lift. As teh airplane falls, it banks even though there is no Earth 'under' the belly. Why? I'm not sure I understand the question. But if you put an airplane in a knife edge and let it dive as it will, and maintain a lift-producing AOA, the wing will push air in the belly direction, as it pushes itself against that air in the antibelly direction. Some of that air will swirl around the wing, but enough of it will dissipate the momentum that the wing imparted to it over the entire atmosphere, and there will be a (very) slight breeze blowing in the belly direction. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 27th 05 07:23 PM |
| Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 01:56 AM |
| Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? | Blueskies | Piloting | 14 | July 12th 05 06:45 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |