![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
[snip]
I think we are pretty much in full agreement, and were merely using different words, or stressing concepts that don't matter for the image being discussed by the other. When an infinite (or 2D) wing starts its takeoff roll, is there not a vortex generated? Is not some air thrown down at the outset? (Granted the vortex isn't at the wingtips and has a different axis, but air goes down behind the wing and up ahead of it, which wasn't the case before the takeoff roll). Steady state, the wing keeps throwing air down but it keeps coming back up (in front of it). I suppose I am using the term "throwing air down" a bit more sloppily than you are taking it - I do mean it to be the same as "imparting a downward acceleration". However, in all the pictures I've seen, air does leave the wing with a downward velocity with a wing in level flight. I just find the image to be more useful to me than the "high pressure low pressure" because it better explains where the pressure comes from. It still sounds like you are just saying that since some air is somehow held down so it can later "come back up" you are simply saying that there is some density increase for higher pressure air. While true to a tiny extent, this is irrelevant to the whole issue. I'm saying it just to answer the (valid) question of "where the air goes". Just enough of it gets scrunched up to hold the airplane up. PV=nRT. In this case the V is big (and not really well defined), and nRT is effectively constant. Even if the gravity does not affect the fluid, an underwater wing moved through the water at an AOA will apply a force to the fluid and cause it to move down. The longer you do this, the longer that force will accelerate the ball of fluid down. Exactly. And this is the reason I hold to "the wing throws the air down, the earth gets in the way". You don't need any compression to have pressure. Pressure is sufficient for lift. A perfectly incompressible fluid still has pressure. Pressure is sufficient for lift. but a perfectly incompressible fluid is an ideal that does not exist. The electrons get squished a little harder; that supplies the force. Granted this is not important in the calculation of what pressure does, and the distances involved are less than miniscule, but it is important conceptually in seeing "just how things work" on a basic level. "It goes =somewhere=." I think we are basically in agreement with the physics, just disagree as to what parts of the physics are important, because we are evaluating importance differently. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 07:58 PM |
| GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 27th 05 07:23 PM |
| Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 01:56 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |