![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Newps" wrote in message
... Baloney. If you get a chance go to any big airport on a day with light winds. Most of these airports have preferred runways, landing in a particular direction is preferred by the controllers for any number of reasons. If the wind shifts to make that runway a tailwind, but it's only 5 knots or so, you will land with a tailwind or you will go somewhere else. Same as my previous example about the crosswind. Frankly, if a controller tells me I'm to land with a tailwind, he can get stuffed. Aside from the "hey, that fence is rushing at me quite quickly" factor, you also have the issue of the extra strain it's putting on the tyres/landing gear because the ground speed is so much higher. Generally, of course, the controller will try to accommodate you if you don't like the "preferred" runway. This happened on my final PPL "skillls test" - there was a highish (unforecast) crosswind on the east-west runway by the time, and I wasn't sure whether the examiner would insist I used that. So I said to him: "Do you want me to use 27, or are you happy for me to ask for something different?". In hindsight, his reply was obvious: "You're the pilot, you ask him for whatever you want - even if it means us diverting". So I asked for RW22 (stiffish breeze only just off the centreline) and got it. I've been a passenger in a light aircraft where the controller has insisted on the PIC using a particular (shortish) runway with a tailwind, though. Fortunately, the PIC was (a) a 14,000-hour veteran and (b) a stroppy, but polite old git. The discussion was an interesting one to hear, but the one-sentence summary goes something like: "You don't have a clue what you're saying, you don't have the performance documents or POH for this aircraft to hand, and you're not responsible for the safety of this aircraft; I am, though, so I'm going to do a visual approach to RWXX instead, and you can lump it. When we're safely on the ground, if you want to come and argue with me, that's fine". To the controller's credit, we sat and had a coffee with him later and both sides explained their point of view in a grown-up manner, and the controller went away with the understanding that if we'd landed with the tailwind, we stood a good chance of being in the hedge at the other end. D. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 04:55 AM |
| Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 03:24 PM |
| Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 12:35 PM |
| Outfly the wind | Doug | Piloting | 7 | July 6th 05 04:18 PM |
| LX4000 wind calculation | AttentionLEcureuil | Soaring | 2 | June 23rd 04 05:33 AM |