![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message news:XygLg.26301$CL6.23010@trnddc06... W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.) wrote: After two or three days, with his ship not going as well compared with the others as he expected, he removed it. The difference was immediate and obvious, he described to me the difference with it fitted as turning the ASW27 into an ASW20! Remember, he had been flying with the antenna for some time, it was only in contest against other similar gliders with good pilots that he saw the difference. I remain sceptical: I sure didn't see any difference at all when I fitted a transponder antenna to my ASH 26 E, flying against gliders I'd flown with for years, nor have I heard of anyone else noticing a difference. Perhaps something unusual was occurring in his case. He was flying in a very competitive Nationals (entry of 35) against 11 other gliders of identical type. Some 5 of the competitors have represented the UK in Worlds, including one current world champion. See http://www.cotswoldgliding.co.uk/com...ts/15m2006.htm . The antenna was fitted on the port side underneath, close to the wheel door. It was the type with a short wire and a sphere on the end. Please do not talk as if flying in UK contests involves the same collision risk with CAT as flying in the high skies around Minden (I have never done that, alas!). I won't, and I didn't. My remarks were directed at a Std Cirrus pilot who felt he needed every crumb of performance, and that was why he wouldn't consider a transponder. My belief the drag increase is insignificant, so it shouldn't be a factor in his decision. The need for it and the cost are the most important factors, I think. To anyone buying a new modern machine from Schleicher, Schempp or the others, the cost of fitting a transponder is only a small percentage of the total cost, but would still involve finding panel space, and sufficient power (particularly if the transponder is to be on whenever airborne). But there are still a lot of low value gliders in use in the UK, and a lot of gliding being done where the actual collision risk where a transponder would make a difference is very small. Also the situation in much of the USA. Though, I don't think the value of the glider should be a factor in the decision to install a transponder. I realize you are using the glider value as a proxy for the spare cash the owner has, but I'd rather the focus was on the collision risk, the value of reducing it, and the cost of installing a transponder. It is the cost of the instrument, of the cabling and antenna, of the extra battery power, and of the installation. It is not only the cost in cash, but also the cost in space needed, and in loss of disposable weight. It also has to do with how the glider will be flown. Fitting a transponder would do hardly anything to reduce collision risk for most gliding in the UK. It will only help those who can and want to fly high in wave. From the posts I have been reading the situation is quite different in the Minden area, though even there it seems that the routeing of CAT into and out of airfields could be improved. In the USA, I wonder how many of the 1-26 fleet are fitted? I don't know, but some do have them in the Minden area. Are you allowed to fly in airways in the UK (as we do in the US), and would having a transponder give you greater access to them? For UK ATS Airspace Classifications see http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/64/ATS_Classifications.pdf , one page. For the CAA publication "Guide to Visual Flight Rules in the UK" see http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/64/DAP_ACD_VFR_Guide.pdf 40 pages. The section "Gliders" is on page 23. Note that nowhere is there any mention of transponders. In class A and B airspace the controller will be helped if a transponder is fitted and used, which is why some UK pilots are carrying them. Obviously a controller is more likely to help if the glider can squawk. Note: email address new as of 9/4/2006 Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA "Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 7th 06 12:13 AM |
| Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 06:58 PM |
| Seniors Contest | Bob Fidler | Soaring | 68 | March 17th 05 04:50 AM |
| Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer | Gary G | Piloting | 38 | February 16th 05 11:41 AM |
| Announce/USA: FAA Glider Flying Handbook / Bob Wander | SoarBooks | Soaring | 0 | August 11th 03 04:55 PM |