![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
But the first seems much more manoeuvring, possible preventing as good
a look out as the second option. I'm actually wondering if the second seems more practicle. Stan On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:26:54 -0800, "Bob Gardner" wrote: I like your first solution better than the second. Having said that, neither the regs nor the AIM provide much guidance in the situation you describe. Look at Advisory Circular 90-66A for more relevant information. Bob Gardner wrote in message .. . Consider you're NE of the airfield, non towered airport, runway 18/36, standard left pattern applies, with runway 36 the active. I'm interested in hearing what your personal method of joining the pattern would be, while adhering to the FAR's and AIM. I've two thoughts: Fly south, then west, pass overhead the field, and then 2 or 3 miles later do a descending 225 degree right turn, and join on a 45 degree to downwind, or Stay east and then south of the airport, and join a straight in outside 5 sm. Opinions? Stan |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| joining the traffic pattern quandary | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | January 17th 05 06:07 PM |