A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Swedish underground hangars, photos



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old July 1st 03, 04:50 PM
Urban Fredriksson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 07:22:44 -0400, "patrick savoie"
wrote:


Very interestings pics. I wonder how they handled noise & air quality with
engines running. It must have been very exciting to be inside when aircraft
were launched.


Actually, they weren't, as they were towed to the surface.

But at least some of them were designed to let aircraft
taxi out under their own power. I don't think anyone
cared much about air quality in the 1950's, most likely
there were other safety concerns or something which proved
to be impractical.

I wondered that too but thought they probably used ear defenders like
on a carrier and probably had some filtration system like in a nuclear
bunker.


For most practical purposes, they were intended as full NBC
protected bunkers. But I won't go into detail...

Urban do you know why they are no longer used?


....because they *are* used! It's just that the F 18 and F
9 wings have been disbanded. And F 8. F 16 will be
disbanded as a _wing_ at the end of 2003, but still be
used as a military airfield, but as I understand it, not a
"war base" (although that doesn't have the same meaning
now as before).
I guess they can be documented better when all are out
of use. And they're not the only interesting things the
air force has had inside mountains. Air defence centres
are sort of obvious, but I think quite a bit of the fuel
storages were intended for the air force as well. Many of
these, not only the air force's are closed now, sealed,
for sale or sold.

This is mostly about dispersed basing:
http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/aviation/text/bas/dispersed_basing.html
But it explains the thinking behind the underground
hangars: They were mainly intended for interceptor
squadrons near our largest cities; The rest of the air
force was supposed to rely on dispersal and camouflage.
There's also the matter that you can't build them
everywhere there's an airbase. (We've got one naval wharf
inside a mountain (you can imagine what you need to lift a
periscope out of a submarine), but when it was planned, we
planned for four more but couldn't find a place in the
south - a hangar doesn't take quite as much but most wings
weren't planned with that in mind.

I've recently learned that at F 18 there's a lower level
which was never finished; Just empty space and gravel
floor today.
--
Urban Fredriksson http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/
A king and an elephant were sitting in a bathtub. The king said, "pass
the soap" and the elephant said, "No soap, radio!"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photos of damage to J3 Cub propeller after new engine mount installation [email protected] Home Built 0 August 9th 04 10:32 PM
Photos of damage to J3 Cub propeller after new engine mount installation [email protected] Home Built 0 August 9th 04 10:31 PM
Rec.Aviation "Rogue's Gallery" of aircraft photos update Jay Honeck Home Built 8 May 4th 04 06:01 AM
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS Home Built 1 October 13th 03 04:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.