A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

launching V-1s from an aircraft carrier



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32  
Old July 30th 03, 12:03 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"The Blue Max" wrote in message
s.com...

"Keith Willshaw" wrote

It is and changing the C of G by putting the fuel that far forward in

flight
would likely overwhelm the flight control system as the c of g
changed. In any event fuel was far from being the only limit on
the Fi-103's range. The supply of compressed air for the flight
control system was limited as was battery power and the engine
shutters on the pulse jet engiine.


Interesting. Sounds like adding range would have been tricky.

The fact that the Germans reverted to firing these weapons from
aircraft rather than modifying them as you suggest after the launch
sites were overrun further points to the impracticality of the notion


I think they had other things on their mind at that point. V-1s did

perform
a useful task, even in small numbers, in tying down air defence assets

which
would have been more useful elsewhere...which is what my what-if is
exploring.

The USN and USAAF had radar equipped aircraft operating 24/7
as well as suface ships and submarines, they could no more expect
to be undetected than Bismarck was


They don't necessarily need to be undetected. They just need to be
underestimated as a threat at the range in question.


The USN NEVER underestimated a carrier group after Pearl Harbor

The US occupied Iceland and Greenland in 1941


Would they have done that if there were no Battle of the Atlantic going

on?


Yes , it was an obvious staging point for a transatlantic raid and an
invaluable air base.

Trouble she couldnt beat Russia


Another thread...

and there's no reason whatever to assume
Canada would stop fighting, particualrly with the US in the war


Only against Japan. I am assuming that the Commonwealth as a whole would
have accepted sufficiently generous terms. AFAIK there was a substantial
lobby in Britain post-France to do just that.

most important of all you have assumed the US would not react to
such events. a poor asumption IMHO


No, I'm just assuming they'd underestimate or misapprehend the precise
threat posed by 2 German CVs and would be geared to meet air attacks on
shipping, rather than a long-range raid on a militarily useless target.

The
raid would be unrepeatable but the idea is to tie down forces to make sure
of that.


The chances of the USN underestimating the threat posed by the
Kriegsmarine, especially equipped with carriers is precisely zero.

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 04:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 1st 04 03:31 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 September 2nd 04 06:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 2nd 04 08:17 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 08:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.