![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2007-04-30, Brian wrote:
It makes sense to me to charge by Hobbs on constant speed props because charging by Tach encourages running High MFP and Low RPM. Low RPM is ok but need to keep the MFP in line with it as well. That's an old wives' tale, I'm afraid. The best regime to operate an engine (most efficient and least maintenance) is the lowest RPM and highest MP for the desired power setting. There are some caveats (some aircraft have a range of RPMs which you should not continuously operate the engine), but generally speaking, using the lowest RPM possible for the desired power setting results in less noise, less vibration and less wear on the engine. The thing about operating engines (specifically normally aspirated flat engines like most of us use) 'above square' is hogwash, I'm afraid. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch | Nathan Young | Owning | 25 | October 10th 04 05:41 AM |
| Logging Time Consistently - Hobbs AND Tach | Carl Orton | Piloting | 11 | June 29th 04 10:52 PM |
| First time airplane buyer, First time posting | Jessewright8 | Owning | 3 | June 3rd 04 03:08 PM |
| Tach Vs. Hobbs Time | John Roncallo | Owning | 33 | January 7th 04 01:42 AM |
| Next Time I Do Fabric Work on an Airplane | Larry Smith | Home Built | 11 | November 22nd 03 07:23 AM |