![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 30, 7:43 am, Richard Riley wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 06:33:10 GMT, cavelamb himself wrote: Richard Riley wrote: On 29 May 2007 11:02:30 -0700, Bob Kuykendall wrote: As for another poster who says that 6061-T6 is too brittle, do you have a cite for that very general assertion? How does that reconcile with the fact that Zenith makes entire airplanes out of the stuff? Of course, that didn't work out so well when they made the Cricket. Uh, because it was designed for 6061-T6? I'm not speaking from personal knowledge, but it's been on the CriCri mailing list several times. The Cri-Cri was designed for 2024-T3 for the spar fittings and a few other places. When Zenith struck a deal to sell kits in the US they substituted 6061 and called it the Cricket. The results were very bad. To this day the designer refuses to sell plans within the US. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The Hummelbird plans show 2024T3 for the wing spar attach fittings, but it's not really obvious and if the builder is busy cutting 6061 for all the other stuff he might just make them out of it. Could be bad. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bending brake capacity: 2024-T3 vs. mild steel? | Ihab Awad | Home Built | 2 | June 6th 05 09:50 PM |
need 2024 t3 5 foot by 12 foot .020 | groundloop | Home Built | 2 | August 22nd 03 04:29 PM |