![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jun 11, 1:09 pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Myth: It is impossible to perform a barrel roll such that the pilot feels exactly 1 gee of force perpendicular to the floor of the cockpit. (Barrel roll is defined here as the maneuver depicted by the definitions and diagrams on these website:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrel_...arrel_roll.jpg) Fact: The aspect that I think appears to mislead people is the presence of a gravitational field and an implied requirement that the axis of the helix must remain straight and parallel with the (flat) ground. But the latter requirement can be dispensed with and still yield a recognizable helical flight path - and that is enough to make a 1 gee barrel roll possible. The "trick" is accomplished by superimposing two equations of motion: (1) Start with a "zero gee" parabolic trajectory. So basically the plane travels laterally over the ground while first traveling up (and then down) such that the pilot would feel weightless absent any other motions. The arc is a classic parabola. (2) Superimpose by vector addition the centrifugal force of the plane "flying" a circle around (and along) the moving center established by the parabolic trajectory in (1). (3) Set the radius and angular speed of the circle in (2) to yield one gee equivalent force and rotate plane's attitude to keep the centrifugal force vector perpendicular to the floor. End of procedure. A reasonable nit pick is that the axis of the helix of the barrel roll doesn't remain "straight and level." But none of the definitions explicitly state that requirement. And in any case, it is possible to end the 1 G barrel roll at the same altitude at which it began. So there. :-) (If there is a demand (and I can find more time) I can work out and post the complete set of equations of motion.) The answer to your question as you ask it is no. You can not perform a "Barrel roll" and maintain 1 G. We all have 1 G pressing on us as we are sitting at our desks, or flying straight and level in an airplane. To perform a barrel roll, you pick a point 20 degrees off heading (usually to the left in aircraft with US engines). You then must execute the beginings of a loop by applying back pressure on the stick. You can not do this without adding additional G forces. You should be at 90 degrees bank when you are just over the point you selected 20 degrees off the origional heading. As you continue the roll, you will be at a point 40 degrees off the origional heading when you have completed 180 degrees of roll and your wings should be level with the horizion in the inverted position. As you continue the roll the nose of the aircraft will be 20 degrees below the horizion and at a 90 degree bank when you are back at the point 20 degrees off the origional heading. You now continue the last quarter of the roll while "pulling" to wings level - again you can not do this without adding G. I have done thousands of barrel rolls - and have done them with open bottles of water on the dash - same principle as swinging a bucket of water over your head and not spilling any. As long as you keep positive "G" (not gee) force on the plane - the water will not spill - let it go negative and you will have a mess. If the question you are asking is can this maneuver be done by adding 1 additional G unit (now you would be at 2 G's) the answer is you could rotate around and probably not spill the water, but you would not execute what is considered a "Barrel Roll" - it would be more of a sloppy aileron roll where you end up lowing altitude from your origional position. A "slow roll" is one where the aircraft follows a straight line and if you are doing these on a horizontal line you will not keep "positive" G's on you and the aircraft. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dispelling the Myth: Hillary Clinton and the Purple Heart | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 21st 06 06:41 AM |
| Impossible to ditch in a field (almost) | mindenpilot | Piloting | 29 | December 12th 04 12:45 AM |
| bush: impossible to be AWOL (do vets give a sh!t) | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | September 8th 04 05:20 PM |
| cheap, durable, homebuilt aircrafts- myth or truth? | -=:|SAJAN|:=- | Home Built | 27 | January 8th 04 10:05 AM |
| The myth that won't die. | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | December 19th 03 07:15 PM |