![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
"phil hunt" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:23:52 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote: Erm no We are a multinational who write MANY software packages. But feel free to browse the web for commercial software developed for Linux and compare that developed for Windows. There's a lot less for Linux. But Linux's market share is growing anyway. Why? Because commercial software is getting less important, and open source software more important. Oh come on , what percentage of PC users even own a C++ compiler let lone know how to use it ? For an increasing number of application spheres -- note I'm not claiming for everything -- open source is the best solution for the job. Web servers being a good example. I'll grant you that for server aplications UNIX is clearly superior If that's the state of your logic, I hope they don't employ you as a programmer! BTW, the last car I owned was made by an American company; this proves that no companies outside the USA manufacture motor vehicles. I am only commenting on the reality of our customers preferences, personally I prefer Unix but the reality is most end users dont, Have most end users even used Linux? No, which is rather the point. I contend that for many tasks -- examples being browsing the web, reading email and Usenet, doing word processing, Linux-based systems do the job perfectly well, But they lack the market share without the issues of cost, insecurity and vendor lock-in associated with Microsoft. Dell had it as an option on their PC's for a a while, they dropped it from the Desktop range due to lack of interest Indeed. I'm not saying Linux will conquer the desktop tomorrow. It'll make headway on servers first, and in middle-income countries (those that are rich enough to have lots of computers, but poor enough that the cost of MS Windows and Office is problematic). It'll also make headway in cultures where localisation is a problem and MS don't have adequate solutions with local fonts, translations etc. Microsoft have at least as good a selection of foreign fonts and character sets as any implementation of Unix I've seen Then it'll make big headway in the office in western countries. Microsoft is likely to hold onto the games market longer than anywhere else. Actually thats where third party software is most succesful If I knew I'd be investing in it not talking about it, that said governments have a poor track record in forecasting IT developments. But it's easier to predict the future if you make it. Its even easier to go bust ignoring what your customers demand, we can sell em Unix versions tomorrow, we still support it for existing customers and they are on the price book but I dont expect to sell any. Keith |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |