![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Widely reported where? This is going to sound like a copout but I read a LOT. It could have been any number of places but I know I've seen it numerous times and I RARELY rely on company propaganda for information. Usually company sites are good for photos or videos (except for the exceptionally lame Northrop Grumman site). If you look at the Raytheon site http://www.raytheon.com/products/aim9_x/ you'll see that the canard configuration is similar to the AIM-9M. The canards are much smaller and fixed. Some improvement in range is possible. Much higher is questionable. ASRAAM and Python have much larger motors for the same generation seeker technology (same seeker in ASRAAMs case) indicating that designers not tied to a large stock of existing ordnance feel that more impulse can be usefully employed exploiting the seeker's performance. IIRC all the rest of the entries for which the -9x as-is was selected had bigger motors too. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |