![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:23:25 GMT, "Tom Cooper" wrote:
"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message .. . No flares on F-4s in SEA. (Photo-flash carts on RF-4s only). No self-protection chaff carts either. We carried cardboard boxes (about the size of a box of Xmas tree tinsel) in the speedbrake wells. Open the boards to deploy. Try not to use speed brakes earlier in the mission. One time use. Ed, do you possibly know the reasons why no chaff/flare dispensers were mounted on Phantoms at the time (and, AFAIK, for most of the 1970s)? From the standpoint of our days this appears as a very strange measure to me: given how many R-13 shots could have been averted over Vietnam alone.... Tom Cooper They weren't mounted because they didn't yet exist. The ALE-40 (the blister dispenser bolted on the side of the wing pylons) came into production around '73 or '74 after the air war was over. As I mentioned, the operational E-models got them, but they never got retrofitted to the C's that were still active. (I don't know about the D's.) What's an R-13? Do you mean SA-7 or Atoll? SA-7 was pretty much a "no threat" for fast movers in SEA. Atoll was a player, but if you knew the guy was back there, you maneuvered to defeat. If you didn't know he was there, flares wouldn't have been much good. A lot of the MiG successes were unseen blow throughs where flares wouldn't have been employed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|