![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vaughn Simon wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Loose some weight Darrel. ![]() at 44 inches. It is a little tighter because of the center console but after you get used to it it is much more comforable than a 172. I recently checked out in the factory-made version of the 601 and find the climb performance with two aboard marginal (and I live at sea level). Because of this, it is the only plane that my FBO routinely does not fill the tanks on. Balanced against that, I love the visibility, love the maneuverability, & love the modern panel after a lifetime of steam gauges. You can feel what I assume is the wing spar sticking into your back through the otherwise comfortable seats. It would be just bad enough to totally ruin a long XC. I've flown in 3 different 601XL. One that was Jabiru powered and two Corvair powered. I haven't flown in the O-200 powered version and only with a relitively light pilot in the Jab version. The Jab climbed at just under 1000 fpm. Both the Corvair powered 601s beat that with more load. I think that was probabaly the seat design the factory uses sticking in your back. They break the seats into two parts and the bottom comes up to about the lumbar area of your back. I didn't like that either and plan to use a different approach. I am not sure that I would describe it as "roomy". For example, my kneepad limits stick movement, so I have to leave it off my leg and drape it across the center console. Being a "glider guy", I have no problem with canopies in general, but find the one on that particular plane to be a serious disappointment. One needs to fuss with it to get things to line up before it will click closed. This is best done with two sets of hands & is a total pain when solo. And it is not the easiest thing to build either. I'm doing that now. My general feeling is that it could easily be my favorite 2-place if it had a few more feet of wingspan to help the climb and a few important details attended to. Vaughn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is the "funnest" 2 place airplane | Doug Wells | Piloting | 7 | September 9th 07 03:56 PM |
Iran: Pieces in Place for Escalation/"The fuel for a fire is in place" | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | January 21st 07 08:02 PM |
FSX - necessary to have CD in place? | Jeroen Wenting | Simulators | 6 | November 11th 06 07:12 AM |
FS: Two-place | Charles Yeates | Soaring | 0 | September 18th 06 10:01 PM |
6 place airplane | Marval | Owning | 29 | January 25th 04 07:17 PM |