Liar Liar Pants On Fire Dept: Moller

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Mark Hickey wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Mark Hickey wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

On 7 sep, 07:35, Mark Hickey wrote:

Ummm... look above. I am asking for a SINGLE quote to prove your
assertion that Iraq was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Here you go,

If you deny this you're as big an idiot or bigger than Bush

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vefD3WSiis

While I'm sure that virtually everyone in the US watched and was
influenced by an 11 minute interview on Irish television (LOL), you're
only proving my point by not being able to produce a single quote.

Yeah, right. Figured you would say that.

Why wouldn't I? There's nothing in that interview even REMOTELY
connecting Iraq and 9/11 other than the fact they are both mentioned
during the course of the interview... (I couldn't help myself and
watched it). The only segment in which both were mentioned in any
proximity to each other:

"On September the eleventh 2001 we were attacked in an unprovoked
fashion. Everybody thought the world was calm. And then there
had been bombings since then. Not because of my response to
Iraq... there were bombings in Madrid, there were bombings in
Istanbul, there were bombings in Bali, there were killings in
Pakistan."

Is THAT supposed to be your "smoking gun"??? LOL.

And, BTW, it was picked up by CNN.
and I'm sure most people didn;t watch it or anything else that might
offer a point of view that might upset the apple cart.
Which would go a long way towards explaining why a dip**** like that got
elected in the first place.

Speaking of which - have you found a quote that backs up your "slam
dunk" position yet? Just one? C'mon, Bertie... what'll everyone
think if you come off so convinced of your point, and then totally
fall flat on your face when it comes to backing it up to a mental
midget like me?

Mark "I guess it's all relative" Hickey