![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 5:26 pm, "Vaughn Simon"
wrote: "BobR" wrote in message ... I have long believed that nuclear could provide long term solutions to power needs but only if we quit all the bull**** political infighting and find real solutions. We agree! The first step in that direction is to admit that you really do have problems that must be solved. What basic problems are there? We have been operating commercial power reactors in the US for what? 50 years? What unsolved (scientific & engineering) problems do you see? In half a century, I can't point to a case where any member of the public has died (or even been injured) as a result of nuclear energy. You can't say the same about fossil power. We have had our heads up our ass for years and failed to admit the problems with fossil fuels, lets NOT repeat the same mistake in finding replacements. I can't argue with that. Vaughn As I mentioned earlier, the main problem I see in the nuclear industry at this point in time and I am talking about more than just nuclear energy is the issue of dealing with the waste materials. It is not just a problem for the power plants but all other uses as well. With the power generation plants, it is how to dispose of (or recycle) the spent fuel and all other contaminated byproducts. The spent fuel could, as someone pointed out, possibly be recycled for other uses if some way can be found to do so safely which is the current delima. The bigger issue though might be the other contaminated byproducts including the cooling liquids, and the facilities themselves as they reach their useful life and are decommisioned. All of the contaminates must ultimately be disposed of in a manner that does not contaminate the environment or pose health hazards to anyone who might come in contact with them. I know, the same issues are there with fossil fuels but that does not excuse us from proactive decisions on nuclear issues. Most of the contaminates from fossil fuel generation can be scrubbed from the environment within a few years to few decades by natural processes. Thas assumes that we don't continue to add to the polutants. Not so for nuclear waste. The contaminates from nuclear waste and / or nuclear accidents will take nature thousands of years to scrub. The potiential effects are far worse. All that being said, I would much rather live next door to a nuclear plant than a coal plant. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I know there are electric powered sailplanes but | YouHelpBuild.com | Soaring | 12 | November 19th 07 01:57 PM |
Solar Electric Powered Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 33 | November 6th 05 08:37 PM |
Solar Electric Powered Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 31 | November 6th 05 08:37 PM |
Is a Turn Coordinator an electric motor or powered by fan? | kickinwing | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 05 12:25 PM |