![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 18, 1:37 pm, Dylan Smith wrote:
On 2008-01-18, D Ramapriya wrote: Albeit that they aren't always fully reliable in such matters, eye- witness reports seem to indicate that in the final moments before landing, the 777 had a distinct nose-up attitude. A normal landing in a B777 is distinctly nose up. I wouldn't like to wheelbarrow one of those. But this wasn't a normal landing. The 777 was reportedly circa 500 ft when the pilot noticed that the engine wasn't responding to greater power. My Q is that once it was known that power was off, shouldn't the pilot have pushed the nose down a bit to increase the airspeed to be able to land as further down as possible since a nose-up attitude with idling or shut engines can only sink the aircraft faster? As it transpired, it came down some 300 meters from the runway edge. Wheelbarrowing is just not on, I'd imagine. If there was that much airspeed, why'd he crash-land short in the first place? From the sunny Isle of Man. Sunny in mid-Jan? ![]() Ramapriya |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Fwd: Concord at Heathrow?] | Markus Baur | Aviation Photos | 3 | December 27th 07 12:55 AM |
| B747 at Heathrow | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 8th 07 10:47 AM |
| A380 flew into Heathrow today | Kingfish | Piloting | 82 | May 30th 06 02:55 PM |
| Google Earth Heathrow 9L approach | news.east.cox.net | Piloting | 23 | April 20th 06 10:36 PM |