![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Swallow wrote:
:Ray O'Hara wrote: : wrote in message : ... : See: : : http://defensenews.com/story.php?i=3466832&c=FEA&s=CVS : : : What should the Navy do? Buy more F/A-18's? Speed up JSF : procurement? : : Or something else? : : gap vs who? : : :Try the Chinese attack submarines. : Oh, don't be silly! How the hell can there be a 'gap' between non-ASW aircraft and submarines? The 'gap' being discussed is between retirement dates for F/A-18C/D airframes and the fleet entry of F-35C to replace them. Without some action the F/A-18C/D aircraft have to retire, as they are getting too many flight hours and cat/trap cycles on them to retain without doing something. Without some sort of procurement there will be no airframes to replace them with for several years after they are gone. I don't see how accelerating F-35C buys is possible, since neither the money nor the aircraft will be available. Trying to recondition high flight time airframes is probably a non-starter, since that would probably cost as much as buying them new. Except you can't buy them new because the C/D line is closed. To me it makes sense to trade off some or all of the projected future JSF buy to buy more capable F/A-18E/F airframes at half the price of buying F-35C. -- "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute." -- Charles Pinckney |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Navy pilots thank plant with tours of fighter jets | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 13th 05 02:50 AM |