![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
sisu1a wrote:
If structure does not change the aerodynamics of a wing, then why are modern hot ships still made of wood, or metal? When the shift from wood and metal to fiberglass occurred, a huge factor was cost: it was much cheaper to build a glider to the tolerances required in molded fiberglass than the other materials, and it retained the shape better. At that time, you could build a lighter aluminum glider of the same performance, but it was a constant effort to keep the airfoil correct. I don't know if this is still true for carbon fiber versus aluminum; regardless, I think the cost would still favor the molded construction. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thin Airfoil and Climb Performance | Brad[_2_] | Soaring | 16 | April 3rd 08 06:50 AM |
| climb performance Jet vs Prop | xerj | Piloting | 11 | July 7th 06 07:31 AM |
| Duo Turbo Climb / Altitude performance | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 16 | November 28th 05 09:19 AM |
| relative climb performance | Soaring | 8 | September 17th 05 08:21 PM | |
| 172 N Climb Performance | Roger Long | Piloting | 6 | September 11th 03 12:18 AM |