![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:20:36 -0400, alexy wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: In any case, from your statement above, it would appear that you believe that government regulation would result in increased corporate profits for airline companies. Is that a bad thing for them or their employees? Would passengers accept the slight per-seat increase in cost if it meant fewer and shorter flight delays? In a free-market we'll never have an opportunity to find out. Actually, in a free market, marketing experts have the freedom to research what passengers are willing to accept, and if they determine that passengers would "accept the slight per-seat increase in cost if it meant fewer and shorter flight delays", they would promote their on-time performance. That is only true if logistics permit it. In the current air carrier free market, it is impossible for an airline to offer "shorter flight delays," because market competition forces air carriers to schedule as many flights into hub airports as they can to reduce competitors' operations into those airports. So we'll never know. However, in a managed market, I agree that we will have the opportunity to find out. Passengers would indeed "accept the slight per-seat increase in cost if it meant fewer and shorter flight delays", because they would not have the freedom to do otherwise; some bureaucrat would make that decision for them, and it would be forced down their throats. In a managed market place, there would be no need to offer reduced delay flights for an increased fare, because it's wouldn't be necessary for air carriers to overload hubs as a competitive tactic. Responsible regulators would manage flight schedules, and all would run smoothly. (Now you tell one. :-)) Responsible managers would do that now and the free market would take care of letting the passengers self select when they got to a location IF there were a truly free market now. Most all airports are owned by state and local governments and for some reason have chosen not to let the free market set the cost of the good they are providing i.e. landing spots. If they were to do that the cost of taking off from JFK at 8:00 am on Monday would cost a hell of a lot more than taking off from JFK at 2:20 am on a Saturday. This price difference would then be passed along to the consumer and the slots would naturally balance themselves over time. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Airline Lobby Group Says GA traffic Is The Main Cause Of Airline Delays | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | July 7th 07 02:19 PM |
| Proposed FAA Regulation FAR 1000 | ContestID67 | Soaring | 3 | April 3rd 06 06:58 AM |
| Here it is! Straight from the horse's mouth Existing Training Grandfathered out of regulation | Cecil Chapman | Piloting | 1 | October 29th 04 06:08 PM |
| Cell phone regulation on airlines? | C J Campbell | Piloting | 54 | October 14th 04 05:53 PM |
| Engine "on demand" regulation?? | Frode Berg | Piloting | 7 | January 23rd 04 07:00 PM |