![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:
The above is absolutely correct......... BUT.........Please do a google search for (p51 engine seizure "dudley henriques") and read the thread carefully, especially from the point where Gordo enters it under me. I believe it will be instantly apparent that the reason for this misunderstanding is obvious, and it's probably my fault. I was reacting to someone I don't particularly like and I was mincing words. If you read the thread carefully, you will see that what I was discussing with him about power and rpm was missing a main ingredient; that being what I was assuming he knew, when in actuality, I had completely omitted it from anything I was saying to him. That ingredient is the high rpm prop limiter on the governor of the 24D50 Ham Standard used on the Mustang. If you read what I was writing carefully, I believe you will realize that I was assuming both of were aware of the limiter function in relation to what we were discussing. I was wrong in assuming this. The facts are quite simple. Both Gordo and I know it. The only problem seems to be that he thinks it was he who "taught" me this, and that's pure fiction I can assure you. But the fault remains with me I think. I should have made it perfectly clear to him from the beginning about the prop governor, as I was considering it's function in every post I made to him, but I never actually mentioned it. In summation, it's 101 that rpm and not power is directly related to rotational mass/velocity/inertia with a constant speed prop....UNLESS as I was trying to say, the power is back past the high rpm limit stop as it very well is at idle power on the Mustang. This assumes normal aerodynamic loads on the prop as well. With this in play, it becomes totally correct to say that the rotational forces in play at 15 inches on this airplane are less then they would be at 61 inches, or anywhere else for that matter within the 42 degree pitch limits where a power change or a change in aerodynamic load would cause a pitch change to maintain a constant set RPM on this specific prop. I'm very sorry if what I said was misleading to Gordo. I should have discussed the prop governor with him from the onset. The plain truth is that I was just too ****ed off at him and just plain missed it. Such is Usenet!! :-) Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt What a classic expert at obfuscation you are Henriques...It's actually funny. You're so good that I suspect that you've convinced yourself that you're right here...sad indeed. You're also a classic windbag, in a class by yourself, which I'm sure few on here would deny. --Gord. "Bull ****! This is a constant speed prop. RPM is a set value. The RPM can be set at 3000 and the manifold pressure can be anywhere between 15 inches and 61 inches, and it's the manifold pressure combined with the set RPM that will determine the power.....NOT the RPM!!! Are you trying to tell me that the rotational (energy) of a propeller is the same at 15 inches as it is at 61?". -D Henriques |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 04:13 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 03:31 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 06:15 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 3rd 04 12:41 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |