![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The F-104, XF8U-3 and for that matter the Mirage III all had centerbodies in their inlets to generate a second shock located near the inlet lip. In the case of the F8U-3, the centerbody was the radome. A non movable centerbody ie. a fixed inlet. While I'm with you that Metz is in the best position to know, I will be fascinated to learn how a M2.5 inlet with decent pressure recovery works without some sort of second shock generator in the inlet. The inner wall of the inlet (with the boundary layer splitter) may form a fixed shock generator since the inlet lip of the F22 is "swept" back WRT the splitter. Beats me but both the Crusader 3 and the F-22 have vents to dump excess air overboard at low speed. One thing I find interesting about the F-22 is if you notice in almost every picture taken from chase aircraft it's got it's flaps partially down. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Performance Comparison Sheet | Ed Baker | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 04 03:14 AM |
| Aerobatic engine IO-360 AEIO-360 comparison | Jay Moreland | Aerobatics | 5 | October 6th 04 02:52 AM |
| spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 06:47 AM |
| EMW A6 Comparison to X-15 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 8 | October 2nd 03 03:26 AM |
| Best Fighter For It's Time | Tom Cooper | Military Aviation | 63 | July 29th 03 04:22 AM |