![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:07:38 -0400, Ron Monroe wrote
(in article ): It's not a question of downloading, or not. It's a question of going through 400 or 500 posts at a time, looking for something you really want to look at. I don't want to spend hours, days and weeks putting together photos, and then sorting them out. I have other things to do. So, I am looking for other subjects. Think of it like getting a thousand pieces of junk mail in your snail mail mailbox, but one of the pieces of mail, is actually a bill. You have to go through all of them to find it, before you throw everything out. It's not 400-500 _posts_. It may be 400-500 _parts of posts_, and those who have inadequate newsreaders see them as 400-500 posts, but that's their problem. Get an adequate newsreader. And there is absolutely no consideration for those who are asking not to flood. Nope. You're right. Now, if you look really, really, REALLY closely, you might be able to detect exactly how much I care. It's like he is saying, "I don't care what you want, I'm going to give you what I want, whether you like it or not." I still ask, if a few people want them, why doesn't he send them to those people, directly? how many are there, five? Oh, it might be inconvenient for him, or you, so, I guess it's alright to do it this way, and make it inconvenient for everyone else. It's more than that, and email is _really_ inconvenient. But you know that. Given a choice between inconveniencing me and inconveniencing you, I pick you. You no like? Me no care. It seems that people always want to do what is convenient for themselves, they don't care how it affects the other guy. Those other guys, are "whining". You are. So, there is now a flood of people that are complaining. Well, you don't have to download them, do you? Seems simple enough to me. I think that you whingers are _funny_. I read your stuff 'cause it amuses me. I reply for the same reason. My system automatically downloads the files I want to download; I only have to scan through the newsgroup to see if there was anything I hadn't set the system to download that I may have wanted. When I do that, if I see some posts from a pack of whingers, I read 'em to see what idiocy they've come up with this time. When you lot stop being funny, I'll add an additional filter to my filter list, and killfilter each and every text-only post from someone using MSOE that infests this group. Y'all can then natter away to your heart's content, affecting me even less than you do now. "hielan' laddie" wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:58:51 -0400, B. Hedd wrote (in article ): Lee wrote: "B. Hedd" wrote in : What does one do with 5 gigabytes of shuttle pics? Do you spend a few hours over the course of three or four evenings admiring them? Or do you spread it out to viewing them for 1/2 hour daily for a month or so? Do you go back a couple of times a year and admire them again? Sorry to hurt your delicate sensibilities. I also have about 10.5 gigs of aircraft pictures. Is that OK? It's absolutely OK... What you put on your computer is your business. I'm just curious as to what you do with them. I go over older pix to look for differences and updates... you know, the way he stated he did but you snipped out without marking the snip. "As example, just how many upgrades have been made to the shuttle cockpit since the early 80's? Well, now I have photographic information." Some of us are interested in the history of aviation in general and of particular systems in particular. I also go over pix looking for a particularly good shot and then use them to make various items, including but not limited to my own calendars and other hardcopy. (so I have pinups of Lancasters and Vulcans and Lightenings, the latter including Lockheed, English Electric, and Mitsubishi products, instead of nekkid girls... sue me.) J3's stuff will give me hours, days, weeks, worth of work to go through and sort out and catalogue and drop onto a DVD. After that, I'll be able to find any one of the pix in a matter of seconds. But, hey, if you don't like 'em, don't download 'em. Seems simple enough to me. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NASA HiRes Shuttle Pics.PAR2 | J3 | Aviation Photos | 29 | August 14th 08 01:53 AM |
| NASA HiRes Shuttle Pics.part276.rar (31/35) | Herman | Aviation Photos | 2 | August 13th 08 10:36 PM |
| NASA HiRes Shuttle Pics.vol0005+4.PAR2 (19/19) | J3 | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 11th 08 01:55 AM |
| NASA HiRes Shuttle Pics.part272.rar (01/35) | Bill[_17_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 10th 08 09:35 PM |
| NASA HiRes Shuttle Pics.part228.rar (22/35) | John Crawford | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 10th 08 03:38 PM |