![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Glad to see people Dog-piling on me and exagerating my comments...
*smirk* Makes me wonder why are you folks feeling so threatened and defensive. I'm not advocating a college course in order to get your pilot's license, I'm not calling for any changes at all in my comments... Why are folks blowing this out of proportion? Please re-read my original post carefully. I never said you had to have a "perfect" understanding of aerodynamics. I also never said it would make you a fast race pilot. I'm saying that pilots should understand what is happening - aerodynamically speaking - when they deflect the control surfaces on their aircraft. The sum total of your knowledge should not be "I push the stick to the right to make the airplane roll right". It should be "I push the stick to the right which makes the left wing aileron go down, increasing angle of attack and therefore the lift on that part of the wing. Simultaneously, the right wing aileron is doing the opposite movement with the opposite effect. The net _effect_ is that the aircraft rolls toward the right - with a bit of adverse yaw because the increased lift on the left wing has a bit of rearward action/angle on it." And since people are taking me so literally, let me clarify that I'm not advocating you talk through this whole sequence with each control movement - but it _should_ be something you intuitively know is happening. In a cause-and-effect system like flying, you need to understand the "cause" bit - because the "effect" is only guaranteed under certain limited conditions. What I am claiming, is that knowing this stuff will make you a better pilot and perhaps a more consistent pilot. Most of all it will make you a safer pilot. As Bob Wander is fond of saying, "your aircraft is your life support system". I think its mind-boggling that people are willing to use a life-support system they don't understand. Regarding the sarcastic "National Team" comments: I'm working on that. :-) I've only been flying for 2 years (well, 2.5 if you count powered aircraft as "flying"). I will be competing in my first Regionals here in late April at Warner Springs. Last summer I bought a DG-300 and took my first 7 flights out of an unfamiliar airport (Ephrata). I made 3 flights in excess of 400km (at 82 - 97km/hr); and all 7 flights were in excess of 200km - even the first couple of familiarization flights and on days with OD and rain. I'll let this die now - I'm sure many of you will post follow-on comments that will tempt me to jump back in and clarify - but I'll try to resist. If you're dead set on arguing this, nothing I say will change your mind - so I'll try not to waste everyone's time. --Noel |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Secondary Stall | w3n-a | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | December 10th 08 01:36 PM |
| Stall Characteristics | w3n-a | Home Built | 0 | December 4th 08 03:45 PM |
| Glider Stall Spin Video on YouTube | ContestID67 | Soaring | 13 | July 5th 07 09:56 AM |
| Stall Recovery | Danny Deger | Piloting | 12 | January 30th 07 02:01 AM |
| FS: Blanik L-13 Tail Skid & Tail Wheel Assembly | Tim Hanke | Soaring | 0 | February 8th 05 02:34 PM |