![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Stealth (and the Group)
We may be looking it this the wrong 'way 'round. There are plenty of engines which offer excellent power-to-weight ratios. Unfortunately, they do so at rpm's which make them impractical for slinging a prop UNLESS a PSRU is used. A good case-in-point is the Rotax. The Rotax engine is only 1300cc but it is designed to operate near 6000 rpm. What makes the engine successful is the PSRU between the engine and the prop. There are two obvious conclusions we can draw from this. The first is that the engines themselves, despite any practical combination of cam & cooling, are simply too small to be used with the propeller mounted directed to the crankshaft. (This leads to another series of questions worthy of discussion but which I will leave untouched at this time.) The second point is that the PSRU, which does NOT enjoy the same TBO as the engine itself, has been designed specifically for this application, taking advantage of the engine's torque & power curves, and including mechanical features that make it suitable for the mounting of a propeller; mounting the engine to an airframe and so forth. It may then be argued that we are wasting our time by focusing on the ENGINE; that we should be devoting our energies to a suitable PSRU that may be attached to a WIDE VARIETY of engines. Having devoted most of my attention to the VW engine, I have little to offer the Group should the discussion turn to PSRU's but it would seem that the hand-maiden of these light-weight, powerful engines MUST be an automotive TRANSMISSION having similar features of light-weight and power-handling capacity. Here again, I lack the background and experience to do more than mutter; there are aspects of PSRU's, transmissions and torque converters about which I know nothing at all... other than the fact they must exist (since the engines exist). At the very least, I know the GEARS must exist. Were I in Western Australia, rather than curse the darkness (and wish for a Corvair to suddenly appear on my doorstep) I think I would light a single candle by diving into whatever came my way in the form of light-weight engines and trannies. I suppose there has to be a clutch in there somewhere, so that means I'm probably looking at a flywheel as well... fate stacking the weight against my urge to fly. But perhaps some of those powerful, light- weight engines ARE large enough to be able to drive a prop directly, even if I had to find someone to grind me a new cam. Liquid cooling need not be a road-block IF we begin by throwing out the stock radiator. With ram-air of 90mph or so available for everything other-than take-offs, a pair of heater cores may provide enough area to keep things in the green. Plus, there is a couple of quarts of oil that may also be pressed into service as an auxiliary coolant. The point of all this is that the lack of Volkswagens or other air- cooled engines should not be taken as an automatic out. If push comes to shove I could always convert a stray Holden, offering it up to something like a Pietenpohl. -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Zero time Aero Vee / Monnett engine | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 30th 05 06:02 AM |