![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8/10/2010 9:58 PM, Alan wrote:
A reasonable point. There is a lot of little used space to fly in. As someone who started as a power pilot, I still find it hard to imagine how one would be willing to fly in such close proximity to other aircraft that you cannot continuously see. "Cessna 123, traffic at your 3 o'clock, one mile, same direction" gets my attention. "glider 45, traffic at your 6 to 7 o'clock, 50 yards behind, 100 feet above, circling in same direction" sounds terrifying. (I am in a blind spot for him, and he is in one for me.) I worry enough about a plane a mile away in a traffic pattern. Not having continuous visual separation at 50 yards distance scares me. Your concern is understandable, given your background, but the lack of a motor makes circling together more predictable than attempting the same thing with powered aircraft. Glider sink rates aren't very different when circling, even between a high performance glider and a club trainer, maybe 50 feet/minute. So, for each circle completed, the altitude difference has changed only 25 feet (typical circles take 20 to 35 seconds). Also, because they are going around the circle at about the same rate, the horizontal distance also changes slowly. That's what makes it work: the changes in relative position are slow, because the horizontal distances and vertical distances are changing slowly. Another factor is visibility out of a glider cockpit: it's large bubble canopy makes it far easier to see the other gliders than the typical airplane cockpit allows. A very important factor is most glider pilots have training and experience in circling together, often starting before they have even soloed, which is not the case for airplane pilots. Still, it is riskier than flying alone, but I don't mind doing it with pilots I know and trust (which is most of them), and I sometimes leave the gaggle when proper separation is too hard to maintain. I don't think the proprietary flarm system is the answer (being a fan of open standards). Where's the problem? It works well, it's available relatively cheaply, it's been available for years overseas, there are several licensed manufacturers, and now it's coming the USA. I'd say the proprietary nature is what makes all these things possible, as it guarantees all the units will work with each other. I would much prefer spending my time where the only other traffic is likely to be a bird, and enjoying the view. I enjoy that very much, but it is also great fun to sometimes fly with other pilots. And, a good way to learn more about soaring well, too. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (netto to net to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IGC FLARM DLL | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | March 25th 08 12:27 PM |
| WinPilot ADV & PRO 9.0b Flarm | Richard[_1_] | Soaring | 15 | February 6th 08 10:49 PM |
| FLARM | Robert Hart | Soaring | 50 | March 17th 06 12:20 AM |
| Flarm | Mal | Soaring | 4 | October 19th 05 09:44 AM |
| FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 08:16 AM |