![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 16, 9:37 pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: On 8/16/2010 10:50 PM, kirk.stant wrote: [snip] A. "Right Now Benefits of PowerFlarm" - This product does not currently exist. Has it been submitted to the FCC for approval yet? What is the expect ship date? Late 2010/December according to their USA dealers. [snip] C. PCAS - How does PCAS tell you anything about what kind of target is aiming for you? In fact, it doesn't give you any information on where the target is, whether it's getting closer or moving away. All you know is altitude and range (NO bearing). It's not going to tell you if it's a jet, another glider, or your tow plane. And you are only going to get that much info if the transponder equipped plane is being interrogated. That's not a given if you are flying low in remote areas without radar coverage. What is your point? If the PCAS in PowerFLARM works anwhere nears as well as PCAS units like the Zaon MRX then it is a very useful tool today especially against GA threats. Yes there are restrictions on this, and they've been discussed to death already. Including PCAS capabilities in a 1090ES receiver is easy since all the hardware you need is already there for free. It is just plain and simple a really great idea to add that feature in this product. I expect other 1090ES receiver manufacturers in the portable/low-end market to do exactly the same. Of course without additional 1090MHz receiver hardware a UAT receiver cannot do this. But to caution other folks here, PCAS relies on the inverse square of distance fall of in RF power and assumptions about transponder power output to guesstimate distance, while it works OK it has limits. It is part of the reason why PCAS systems have a relatively short warning range for threats. With fast closure rates like with airliners and jets (esp. at altitude/outside airspace speed restrictions) PCAS systems are quite likely to give unusably short warning times. I see PCAS as making more sense with GA threats and when flying with a reasonably small number of gliders -- what many of us have done with it given the lack of Flarm availability in the USA. What's my agenda? Making sure that people know what they are buying and the limitations thereof. -- Mike Schumann Darryl |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can I build one of you items? | Gig 601XL Builder | Home Built | 3 | December 23rd 06 09:21 AM |
| Build an RV of ??? | William Snow | Owning | 12 | September 8th 06 04:12 AM |
| Build an RV of ??? | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 1 | September 8th 06 04:12 AM |
| How to build a P-38 ? ? ? | Hans-Marc Olsen | Home Built | 42 | December 11th 04 05:06 PM |
| RV Quick Build build times... | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | December 17th 03 04:29 AM |