A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Change the rules for the National Guard.?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 21st 04, 01:50 AM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Change the rules for the National Guard.?
From: Ed Rasimus
Date: 2/20/04 3:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

On 20 Feb 2004 22:20:03 GMT,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Change the rules for the National Guard.?
From:
(OXMORON1)
Date: 2/20/04 1:58 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Art came up with references to Mr Powell's biography/autobiography
referencing
the statement that Art quoted/paraphrased.


I still stand by by statement that in the current situation those

statements
are not applicable and I have serious doubts that Mr. Powell would make the
same statement at this time or during his later career in the Pentagon.
In the current situation the statement that Art quoted/paraphrased is still
bull****. Circa 1965 to 1973 the statement would have been applicable in a
lot
of circumstances, especially if you were a brown bar grunt Lt or an off the
street draftee.

Rick Clark



Your apology is accepted.


Arthur Kramer


I don't know if you've got the Powell book on your shelf. I do. You
might want to continue on to the next paragraph on p. 149 to see the
isolation of the comment to the bankrupt policies of the Johnson
administration. Powell was exactly right when referring to 1967-69 and
should be respected for calling a spade a spade. But, this discussion
is about: first, GWB's experience from 1970-74, and more importantly,
the state of the Guard/Reserve from post-Vietnam until today.

Clearly the record shows that the employment philosophy of the
Guard/Reserve components has changed drastically. Failure to note a
shift in policy over forty years is short-sighted and intellectually
bankrupt.

The Guard and Reserve are very active on the battlefields of America
and deserve the utmost respect.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
Smithsonian Institution Press
ISBN #1-58834-103-8



He wasn't critisizing the guard for christsakes. He was critisizing those weak
bellied *******s who go there to hide. Y'know, the intellectually bankrupt you
are talking about.



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 01:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 10:38 PM
GWB and the Air Guard JD Military Aviation 77 March 17th 04 11:52 AM
best president ever Be Kind Military Aviation 6 February 16th 04 07:59 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 05:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.