![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
anon wrote:
Peter Dohm wrote: n o t n e c e s s a r i l y Trivial in this case, as the tires were not alleged to have gone flat. However, it is a frequently employed method to protect the wheels, and sometimes the tires, while the parts (tubes in this case) are obtained. IIRC, no assertion was made that this was an adiquate temporary service for flight, or even ground operation. Peter My bad. I incorrectly assumed that his #1 response was his reply to the first question about correct tire pressures and his #2 response was his reply to the second question about flat tires. His reply makes perfect sense now that I realize, thanks to you, that both answers were in response to the flat tire question. Apologies to all concerned. My pressure recommendations stand. I will now slither back under my rock. - anon I really was not trying to be that much of a prick. Especially for a canard aircraft, for which there is probably not a formal POH, the tire manufacturer may be of some help. My recollection, admittedly as a student-pilot twenty years ago, is that a Cessna 150/152 with the optional 6.00x6 main tires (5.00x? was standard IIRC) had generally better balanced handling with around 25 psi in the main tires than with 30 psi; which I believe was recommended for the standard tires. The problem that it corrected was not so much that the mains were "bouncy", at the higher pressure, although they were and the lower pressure corrected it nicely; but that the plane did not gain excessive speed on the taxiways at just above idle. Therefore, you could reasonably warm up the engine and taxi out at the same time without additional wear on the brakes. In other words; it was practical to be kind to the FBO, even when renting by hobbs time. There was a very small increment in the take-off roll on smooth concrete, which probably would have been an equally slight decrement on turf or very well maintained grass, when compared to the higher pressure. And, of course much less braking was required after landing... Peter |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Manifold pressure gauge problem | Dave Russell | Aerobatics | 3 | January 29th 04 04:46 AM |
| Nosewheel Shimmy and Scalloped Tire Redux, Plus | Larry Smith | Home Built | 2 | September 15th 03 05:03 PM |
| Scalloped Nosewheel Tire | Larry Smith | Home Built | 7 | September 12th 03 10:16 PM |
| Fuel pressure Problems | smf | Home Built | 3 | September 7th 03 09:25 PM |
| Pressure Differential in heat Exchangers | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:18 AM |