![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:50:27 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
In article , "Kevin Brooks" wrote: "Henry J Cobb" wrote in message ... Bolkcom said the Raptor's 540-nautical mile unrefueled combat radius dictated it operated from forward bases -- another drawback for a Pentagon facing potential conflict in distant lands with perhaps scant bases nearby from which to operate. Or it could be (gasp!) refueled; Or, more to the point, it has a *lot* more than a 540 mile combat radius, over 840 miles. and the source of this 840 mile figure is???, Does that figure include the 200nm supercruise profile? Just want to know... Cheers John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|