![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 27, 6:31*pm, Bruno wrote:
I am planning on getting my order in for the Butterfly next week at the convention so this topic is of great interest. I don't understand why the instrument needs to be disabled. I agree that it could give a competitive edge in competition so why not just make sure the igc records if the artificial horizon feature was used and we are good. *I would hate to disable an instrument for a contest and then need that instrument due to a life or death screw up on my part but it is now disabled. How about a rules consideration that says if an artificial horizon is available during a contest that it must be associated with the logger of the files being used for judging and that a log must be recorded if that feature is used? *It would still be available if the crap hit the fan to save the pilot's butt, however if used, the pilot gets zero points for the day. *Some of the best pilots I know who are also very safety conscious have confided in me that they have been trapped above clouds without an artificial horizon and really scared themselves getting out of it. I for one want the safety of having an instrument to help me if my life depends on it. I am sure the rules can accommodate that. Looking forward to seeing you all next week at the convention. ![]() Bruno - B4 Just to add a bit more fuel to the fire, there is a large body of evidence on the power side that even *with* an artificial horizon and turn indicator, the average lifetime for a non-instrument-rated pilot in clouds is about 3 minutes, and the accident sequences on which this evidence is based almost invariably start with straight and level entry into IMC. Anyone who thinks that just installing an artificial horizon in their glider is a 'get out of jail free' card is fooling themselves. I urge anyone considering this to get a copy of Condor (which has a turn indicator installed in most panels) and try their luck at maintaining any sort of reasonable attitude/airspeed solely by reference to instruments. When I owned a Cirrus SR22 power plane some years back, I carried a GPS-196 (with a GPS-generated artificial horizon and turn coordinator) with me as a last-ditch backup if all the electrics died. This worked, but it took quite a bit of practice to be able to stay reasonably upright using just that instrument. Just my $0.02 TA |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Butterfly iGlide | Reed von Gal | Soaring | 4 | May 2nd 12 07:00 PM |
| WTB: 57mm Cambridge Vario/FS: 80mm Cambridge Vario | ufmechanic | Soaring | 0 | March 24th 09 06:31 PM |
| TE vario | G.A. Seguin | Soaring | 8 | June 8th 04 05:44 AM |
| WTB LD-200 Vario | Romeo Delta | Soaring | 0 | June 4th 04 04:08 PM |