![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 10:22:07 AM UTC-5, wrote:
I'm not sure I see much advantage of a 2:1 system (assuming you mean the reverse-driving vehicle has a pulley as well). Wouldn't you still be dragging 4,000 ft of rope behind the tow vehicle (from the fixed pulley)? It hardly seems worth the extra rigging trouble...but I've never done it either. My primary concern is rope wear, and I'm not seeing much improvement with that. Please let me know what I am missing. Stephen End of rope is anchored to the ground. Rope goes around pulley on the launch car, then back to the glider. Car travels half the speed of the glider (2:1 system). The only rope moving relative to the ground during the launch is the rope between the pulley and the glider. And similar to a winch launch, all that rope becomes airborne pretty quickly. Steve Leonard |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| vortex ring state at any point during an auto?? | Greg Johnson | Rotorcraft | 18 | August 30th 04 10:12 PM |
| Auto Fuel Residue | Stu Gotts | Restoration | 4 | May 12th 04 09:52 PM |
| Auto conversions & gear boxes | Dave Covert | Home Built | 56 | April 1st 04 07:19 PM |
| Arrow auto gear extension oddness | Roy Smith | Owning | 10 | March 8th 04 03:27 AM |
| VOR & Reverse Sensing | mrwallace | Piloting | 1 | August 21st 03 04:08 AM |