![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:19:28 GMT, Guy Alcala
wrote: Yeah, Bob, but that's a post-Vietnam mod; the F-4C (including Olds' 64-0829) could never carry AIM-9s and TERs/bombs during its service in Vietnam, as they used the AIM-9 rack which Ed mentioned, the one hung from the MAU-12. I can't find any photos of any USAF F-4s in SEA up through 1972 with AIM-9s plus any other ordnance on the I/Bs, with one exception. The 432nd carried AIM-9s and pods on the I/B on their F-4Ds starting at some point in 1972, so maybe they got the AIM-9 shoulder mount mod before everyone else. Walt thinks the 366th may have had them as well; the only shots I have of 366th a/c in 1972 show F-4Es with pure A/G or pure A/A loads, so that's no help. "The armament loaded on this F-4C (as displayed) consists of four AIM-7E and four AIM-9B air-to-air missiles, and eight 750 lb. Mk 117 bombs. The aircraft is also carrying two external 370 gallon fuel tanks on the outboard pylons and one ALQ-87 electronic countermeasures (ECM) pod on the right inboard pylon. This was one of the typical armament configurations for the F-4C during the Vietnam War in the summer of 1967." So this isn't accurate?G Just thinking when they went to the inboard pod they lost the ability to carry four AIM-9 from what mid 1967 to 1972? Maybe the Israelis figured two Aim-9 were better than one Sparrow? The thing that tends to convince me there was a clearance problem of some kind is that I can't see the Israelis (or anyone else) wasting all the time and effort to develop an AIM-9 adapter for the forward right Sparrow bay, if they could have just as easily carried dual AIM-9s plus TER/bombs on the I/B pylon -- that would be (Vulcan arched eyebrow) highly illogical. That, and the fact that a cursory search has failed to turn up a single photo of a USAF F-4 in flight carrying AIM-9s and anything more threatening than an ECM or travel pod on the same I/B pylon, although again Walt thinks the 366th may have carried bombs/missiles on the same pylon at Danang (but he's not absolutely certain). Ah well, USAF F-4s in Vietnam may just have been a bit too early to show the mod in use. Guy |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 08:18 AM |
| Mosquito fighter-bomber tactics question | Kari Korpi | Military Aviation | 6 | April 5th 04 10:09 AM |
| Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 08:05 AM |
| Viggen armament question | Kari Korpi | Military Aviation | 0 | March 5th 04 10:47 PM |
| #1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 04:04 AM |