![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So the CFI can hold the door open while taxiing in the summertime.
"Nathan Young" wrote in message om... First off, this isn't a post to argue the merits of one-door vs. two-doors, so if you want to do that, start your own thread... ![]() Why does Piper put the door of the plane on the passenger side? I cannot think of one good reason. Would like to hear the group's opinions. OTOH, I can think of several reasons it would be better to have the single door on the pilots side: 1. Most flights are solo, so with the door on the pilots side, no need to constantly climb across the passenger seat. 2. On that same point, I like to keep my charts and headsets on the passenger seat. Again, I have to crawl over them each flight to get to the pilots seat. 3. It would be nice to allow passengers to board before the pilot enters. 4. Again most flights are solo, it seems that egress in the event of an emergency would be easier with the door on the pilots side. -Nathan |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it harks back to the idea that the pilot should be the first to
enter and the last to leave. - Mark |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"markjen" wrote in message
news:eNncb.569893$o%2.254121@sccrnsc02... I think it harks back to the idea that the pilot should be the first to enter and the last to leave. Ah, but in that case, wouldn't it have been best to have put the door at the *back* to give the rear-seaters a chance to get out? -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tony Cox" writes:
Ah, but in that case, wouldn't it have been best to have put the door at the *back* to give the rear-seaters a chance to get out? That's why there's a baggage door. All the best, David |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tony Cox" wrote in message nk.net... Ah, but in that case, wouldn't it have been best to have put the door at the *back* to give the rear-seaters a chance to get out? Some Piper light aircraft did have a door at the back. The four-place PA-16, PA-20, and PA-22 had doors on the right for the front seats and on the left for the rear seats. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"dennis brown" wrote in message nk.net... Another reason is that it is easier to reach the prop and pull it down to start. Have you seen the old picture of the pilot doing this? Solo. In flight. Prop is stopped. Pilot standing on right gear, left hand holding onto plane. So you think Piper put the door on the right side to make inflight hand propping possible? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, almost yes.
It was fairly common to start planes from behind the prop. Some had no brakes so it was safer than trying to start from the front. If they had chocks, connected by a rope, that would work. But it had the possibility of getting rope and chocks into the prop. I have started a plane by standing across the right gear and bringing the blade down. It was quite comfortable. You're holding onto something (the struts) and you know the prop is not going to run over you. In my old age, I don't prop planes. In article . net, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "dennis brown" wrote in message ink.net... Another reason is that it is easier to reach the prop and pull it down to start. Have you seen the old picture of the pilot doing this? Solo. In flight. Prop is stopped. Pilot standing on right gear, left hand holding onto plane. So you think Piper put the door on the right side to make inflight hand propping possible? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"dennis brown" wrote in message nk.net... Actually, almost yes. It was fairly common to start planes from behind the prop. Some had no brakes so it was safer than trying to start from the front. If they had chocks, connected by a rope, that would work. But it had the possibility of getting rope and chocks into the prop. I have started a plane by standing across the right gear and bringing the blade down. It was quite comfortable. You're holding onto something (the struts) and you know the prop is not going to run over you. In my old age, I don't prop planes. I do prop planes, I own an Aeronca 7AC, and I do prop it from behind. But I'm fairly confident Aeronca put the sole door on the right side because the left side was occupied by throttle linkage, not to make inflight restarts possible. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" writes:
I do prop planes, I own an Aeronca 7AC, and I do prop it from behind. But I'm fairly confident Aeronca put the sole door on the right side because the left side was occupied by throttle linkage, not to make inflight restarts possible. As I mentioned before, passenger entry and exit would also be a consideration. If you want people to be able to get in or out of the plane with the engine still running, the door cannot be on the pilot's side. All the best, David |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| An Erudite Discourse on the Relative Merits and Demerits of the Various Styles of Hangar Doors | jls | Home Built | 1 | October 1st 04 02:52 AM |
| Piper 6.00x6 Nose Wheel and Fork? | mikem | General Aviation | 5 | March 6th 04 12:34 AM |
| Piper Cherokee RFI Capacitor | mikem | Home Built | 0 | January 16th 04 06:09 PM |
| The Piper Cubs That Weren't | Veeduber | Home Built | 5 | August 28th 03 05:38 AM |
| FS: Piper Side Window (New) | JimC | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 10th 03 01:19 PM |