![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BeaglePig" wrote: Pure Urban legend... do the research before you spout such poppycock! I don't have time to research it right now, but there was a guy on either r.a.piloting or r.a.homebuilt... Very convincing. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan,
Pure Urban legend... do the research before you spout such poppycock! I don't have time to research it right now, but there was a guy on either r.a.piloting or r.a.homebuilt... Very convincing. I had to smile - thought the same thing. My recollection is that AOPA wrote about the higher accident rate in Pilot magazine recently. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan Luke" wrote in
: "BeaglePig" wrote: Pure Urban legend... do the research before you spout such poppycock! I don't have time to research it right now, but there was a guy on either r.a.piloting or r.a.homebuilt... Very convincing. Thanks, just as convincing as the original post..... Ok, now that I had a moment to research, the post was by Ron Wanttaja who also was/is the author of an article in Kitplanes magazine in the October issue. Maybe someone who subscribes to Kitplanes can grace us with a summery of the article. BeaglePig |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:42:31 GMT, BeaglePig wrote:
Thanks, just as convincing as the original post..... Ok, now that I had a moment to research, the post was by Ron Wanttaja who also was/is the author of an article in Kitplanes magazine in the October issue. Maybe someone who subscribes to Kitplanes can grace us with a summery of the article. I posted just such a summary to this group less than three weeks ago. How time flies when you're having fun... http://tinyurl.com/4r3mh Ron Wanttaja |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote: Jay, as far as I know, the accident rate with experimentals is WAY higher than with "spam cans". What's the reason for that? Is it building quality? No -- it is usually lack of current experience in the type and performance level of the plane involved. A lot of homebuilders spend all their free time (and money) building and either let their flying skills deteriorate or do not have the skills in the first place. The EAA Flight Advisor program is designed to address this skill gap. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMHO, the reason why there are cheap Glasairs out there is that they
are hard as hell to fly, absolutely frightening to land, visibility out of the cockpit is abysmal, the engines do not get enough cooling air thru them and they're always eating cylinders, and the landing gear is constant need of maintenance. I know two fellows who own them and are both wishing they didn't. I've ridden in both of them.... once each, and I'll never get in another one except perhaps only for taxiing. Jay Honeck wrote: It seems that there are some remarkable deals out there for 200 mph used Glasairs, but I would hesitate to buy one simply because I wouldn't trust the workmanship. What's the consensus on this issue? Is this a valid fear, or -- as some have told me -- does the workmanship on the average home-built meet or exceed that of the average Spam Can? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well....here is a guy with 400+ hrs in a Glasair II. I bought it used with
400 hrs on it. And never a moment regretted it. It flys beautfully, lands like a dream and is good Instrument platform. As a matter of fact i got my Instrument rating in it. Don't listen to the guys that only "think" they know but the ones that have REAL experience in them. I know a lot of glasair drivers and have never heard one say " this plane is the pits". By the way... my engine temps run about about 195degrees and very rarely see 200. The visibilty is good but the only thing you really notice when flying "fast glas" are the spam cans you overtake. steve wrote in message oups.com... IMHO, the reason why there are cheap Glasairs out there is that they are hard as hell to fly, absolutely frightening to land, visibility out of the cockpit is abysmal, the engines do not get enough cooling air thru them and they're always eating cylinders, and the landing gear is constant need of maintenance. I know two fellows who own them and are both wishing they didn't. I've ridden in both of them.... once each, and I'll never get in another one except perhaps only for taxiing. Jay Honeck wrote: It seems that there are some remarkable deals out there for 200 mph used Glasairs, but I would hesitate to buy one simply because I wouldn't trust the workmanship. What's the consensus on this issue? Is this a valid fear, or -- as some have told me -- does the workmanship on the average home-built meet or exceed that of the average Spam Can? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMHO, the reason why there are cheap Glasairs out there is that they
are hard as hell to fly, absolutely frightening to land, visibility out of the cockpit is abysmal, the engines do not get enough cooling air thru them and they're always eating cylinders, and the landing gear is Sorry, I have to stongly dissagree, I flew only C-172/C-182 for 25 years. with 8 hours of training in type before flying mine I found transitioning to be easy. Unless you flew underpowered Glasairs or Taildraggers I dont understand how you came to any of these conclusions. I have very good temps on mine. The glasair landing gear (retract) is absolutely outstanding. I don't know what planet your on but its not this one. constant need of maintenance. I know two fellows who own them and are both wishing they didn't. I've ridden in both of them.... once each, and I'll never get in another one except perhaps only for taxiing. Jay Honeck wrote: It seems that there are some remarkable deals out there for 200 mph used Glasairs, but I would hesitate to buy one simply because I wouldn't trust the workmanship. Jay, a little reasearch and some help from knowledgable Glasair owners to help you on the assesment, I would not hesitate to buy one with proper expert help on the inspection before purchasing. What's the consensus on this issue? Is this a valid fear, or -- as some have told me -- does the workmanship on the average home-built meet or exceed that of the average Spam Can? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Media] A Marine's journey home | Michael Wise | Military Aviation | 0 | May 3rd 04 05:57 AM |
| [Media] A Marine's journey home | Michael Wise | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 3rd 04 05:57 AM |
| Home Inspection Listings | Patrick Glenn | Home Built | 4 | April 26th 04 12:52 PM |
| Home Built Choppers | Chris Stubbs | Home Built | 3 | September 3rd 03 06:04 AM |
| home built sites in Australia? | Chris Sinfield | Home Built | 1 | July 18th 03 05:05 PM |