![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The hobbs seems like a perfect, simple
device. True, except most aircraft (outside of trainers) don't seem to have them. Mine doesn't, and never did. That, and you're stuck using the ridiculous (to me) "1.4 hours" nonsense. Why don't we just use "1:24", like the rest of the civilized world? When I get this new transponder, I'm going to try using its internal "flight time" clock. If it's too much of a pain, I'll go back to the tach time x 1.3. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:vfrFb.617298$Tr4.1604490@attbi_s03... That, and you're stuck using the ridiculous (to me) "1.4 hours" nonsense. Why don't we just use "1:24", like the rest of the civilized world? Time math? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
There a good money reason... Where I usually rent airplaces, they changed billing time to reflect aircraft ground time so instead of paying for exemple for 45 minutes we pay for 0.8 hours ... It's there way to make more money at the end. :-( Tom Sixkiller wrote: "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:vfrFb.617298$Tr4.1604490@attbi_s03... That, and you're stuck using the ridiculous (to me) "1.4 hours" nonsense. Why don't we just use "1:24", like the rest of the civilized world? Time math? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:vfrFb.617298$Tr4.1604490@attbi_s03...
The hobbs seems like a perfect, simple device. True, except most aircraft (outside of trainers) don't seem to have them. Mine doesn't, and never did. My aircraft (Mooney) came from the factory with one. Some argue that its actually the legal way to count 100 hour ADs (since the tach doesn't give 1:1). That, and you're stuck using the ridiculous (to me) "1.4 hours" nonsense. Why don't we just use "1:24", like the rest of the civilized world? Gee, I thought that was the best reason for the 1.4 hours math. Its hard to add up a line of "1:03", "1:23", "1:55". Seems like "1,4" + "1.6" +"1.6" is easier to add. I guess if you're using a computer it doesn't make any difference. When I get this new transponder, I'm going to try using its internal "flight time" clock. If it's too much of a pain, I'll go back to the tach time x 1.3. In my plane (constant speed prop) I find that the hobbs and the tach are almost 1:1. I don't often do pattern work though. On a typical 4 hour flight the tach will be within .1 of the hobbs. I tend to run the engine around 2400 RPM. I would think 1.3 would be very, very generous. In the J-3, I just use my watch since I usually ran the engine way below the 2200 RPM where it turned 1:1. -Robert |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
That, and you're stuck using the ridiculous (to me) "1.4 hours" nonsense.
Why don't we just use "1:24", like the rest of the civilized world? Why doesn't the civilized world give up the 1:24 nonsense, and go with 1.4? Now if we had an extra finger on each hand, I'd differ. Base 12 is really a great base - most fractions are nice fractions. Base ten has only one nice fraction. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message m... My aircraft (Mooney) came from the factory with one. Some argue that its actually the legal way to count 100 hour ADs (since the tach doesn't give 1:1). It is a legal way. The FAA says "hours" and absent any specific instruction from the manufacturer, you can use the recording tach, a elapsed time meter, or some other reliable record. The FAA just asks that you be consistant. However, I don't think they'll buy the TACH multiplied by fudge argument. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article 7oiFb.618964$Fm2.558042@attbi_s04, Jay Honeck
wrote: And if you *are* using the flight timer, have you stopped using the old archaic "1.3 hours" method of recording flight time? Anyone using actual hours and minutes in their logbook instead? I do. I log the following: Hobbs start/Hobbs stop Tach start/Tach stop Clock start/Clock stop Wheels off/Wheels on |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I log the following:
Hobbs start/Hobbs stop Tach start/Tach stop Clock start/Clock stop Wheels off/Wheels on Why do you log four different times? And *where* do you log them? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay Honeck wrote:
I log the following: Hobbs start/Hobbs stop Tach start/Tach stop Clock start/Clock stop Wheels off/Wheels on Why do you log four different times? And *where* do you log them? I rent, so the airplanes have different setups. The Champ has no electrical system, so I have Tach time. Depending on how "fast" (that's a relative term) or slow I fly, the clock time may be greater or less than the tach. On other aircraft with electrical systems, a Hobbs and a Tach, the time will varyfor several reasons. For example, the Hobbs on the Cherokee Six is tied to the oil pressure switch. Until the Tachometer gets above 1600 RPM, the Hobbs doesn't move. By recording Clock start/Clock stop, I have a true reference to Hobbs and Tach. By recording Wheels off/Wheels on, I have an accurate measure of actual flight time. What goes in the logbook is the greater of the three. I have made my own logging cards (5x8 blank index). I have also included blocks for logging fuel used from each tank to maintain fuel load balance and compare to the totalizer. The Cherokee Six and Bonanza have four tanks, do I included blocks for each. The logging card has space for five legs on each side. I have a four-hold punch for flip plates. I include logging cards with each aircraft checklist. The following block titles are used: DATE AIRCRAFT N-NUMBER DEPARTURE AIRPORT DESTINATION AIRPORT TACH START TACH STOP TACH FLIGHT HOBBS START HOBBS STOP HOBBS FLIGHT CLOCK START CLOCK STOP CLOCK FLIGHT WHEELS OFF WHEELS OFF BLOCK TIME RIGHT TIP RIGHT MAIN LEFT MAIN LEFT TIP |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 03:16 PM |
| p3/95 | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 1 | September 27th 04 01:27 AM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |