A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Recording your flight time



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 21st 03, 09:00 PM
Mike O'Malley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:7oiFb.618964$Fm2.558042@attbi_s04...
snip
And if you *are* using the flight timer, have you stopped using the old
archaic "1.3 hours" method of recording flight time? Anyone using actual
hours and minutes in their logbook instead?


Well, most of my flying of late has been towing banners, and the Cubs don't
have ANYTHING electrical in 'em. I look at my watch after I start the
engine write it down on my sheet, go pull the left chock, walk to get the
right one, then hop in and go.

When I shut down, I write down that time as well. Then I have to go back
and convert from HH:MM to HH.(MM/60) for my logbook.

--
Mike


  #2  
Old December 22nd 03, 01:32 AM
Hankal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I use my Westbend clock which I fastened with velcro. I start when departing
and stop after I have cleared the active.
I may be shorting my logbook, but who cares as long as I do not inflate my
time.
Of course I can always substantiate my time since I log every fuel purchase
with tach and hobs time.
Hank
  #3  
Old December 22nd 03, 01:41 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I log what ever my transponder says I flew.



Jay Honeck wrote:

With built-in flight timers becoming the norm in virtually all new avionics
(heck, even the new transponder I'm getting has one), just wondering if
folks are migrating away from using hobbs/tach time to record their flight
time?

And if you *are* using the flight timer, have you stopped using the old
archaic "1.3 hours" method of recording flight time? Anyone using actual
hours and minutes in their logbook instead?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #4  
Old December 22nd 03, 01:48 AM
tony roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

With built-in flight timers becoming the norm . . .

Here in Canada we are required to record flight time and air time.

Flight time for any leg is taken straight from the Hobbs.
Air time is Hobbs minus .2 hour per leg (for runup/taxi etc.)

That is the way that I record all of my flights.

Air time is the time that we record as TBO.
Therefore the more legs we squeeze in, the more .2 hour deductions and
the longer to TBO.

I know one pilot who doesn't have a Hobbs, and who only records about
half his actual time. Having witnessed this I personally would prefer,
in the interests of safety, to see Hobbs time as a legal requirement -
rather like an oddometer reading is required for a used car sale.
It scares me to think that there may be aircraft out there with over
2000 TBO which are being sold as less than 1000 TBO.

--

Tony Roberts
PP-ASEL
VFR OTT
Night
Almost Instrument
Cessna 172H C-GICE
  #5  
Old December 22nd 03, 03:15 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"tony roberts" wrote in message
news:nospam-DBA896.16481821122003@shawnews...
I know one pilot who doesn't have a Hobbs, and who only records about
half his actual time. Having witnessed this I personally would prefer,
in the interests of safety, to see Hobbs time as a legal requirement -
rather like an oddometer reading is required for a used car sale.
It scares me to think that there may be aircraft out there with over
2000 TBO which are being sold as less than 1000 TBO.


TBO is based on tach time, not Hobbs time.


  #6  
Old December 22nd 03, 03:19 AM
tony roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote:

"tony roberts" wrote in message
news:nospam-DBA896.16481821122003@shawnews...
I know one pilot who doesn't have a Hobbs, and who only records about
half his actual time. Having witnessed this I personally would prefer,
in the interests of safety, to see Hobbs time as a legal requirement -
rather like an oddometer reading is required for a used car sale.
It scares me to think that there may be aircraft out there with over
2000 TBO which are being sold as less than 1000 TBO.


TBO is based on tach time, not Hobbs time.




I don't even have a timer on my tach.
Nor was there one on any of the more than 6 aircraft that I trained in.
So I don't agree with your statement.

--

Tony Roberts
PP-ASEL
VFR OTT
Night
Almost Instrument
Cessna 172H C-GICE
  #7  
Old December 22nd 03, 04:04 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"tony roberts" wrote in message
news:nospam-B7CC3C.18191021122003@shawnews...
In article ,
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote:

"tony roberts" wrote in message
news:nospam-DBA896.16481821122003@shawnews...
I know one pilot who doesn't have a Hobbs, and who only records about
half his actual time. Having witnessed this I personally would prefer,
in the interests of safety, to see Hobbs time as a legal requirement -
rather like an oddometer reading is required for a used car sale.
It scares me to think that there may be aircraft out there with over
2000 TBO which are being sold as less than 1000 TBO.


TBO is based on tach time, not Hobbs time.




I don't even have a timer on my tach.
Nor was there one on any of the more than 6 aircraft that I trained in.
So I don't agree with your statement.


No, you don't have a timer on the tach; but that's not the time we're
talking about. The discussion is "flight time" not engine time (for purpose
of TBO).




  #8  
Old December 22nd 03, 04:10 AM
tony roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, you don't have a timer on the tach; but that's not the time we're
talking about. The discussion is "flight time" not engine time (for purpose
of TBO).


You are correct.
One of us is confused - it isn't difficult to confuse me
I originally said:
Flight time for any leg is taken straight from the Hobbs.
Air time is Hobbs minus .2 hour per leg (for runup/taxi etc.)

And air time is what we accumulate to determine when we reach TBO.
I don't know how it works elsewhere - this is how it works in Canada.


--

Tony Roberts
PP-ASEL
VFR OTT
Night
Almost Instrument
Cessna 172H C-GICE
  #9  
Old December 22nd 03, 03:33 AM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ...

It scares me to think that there may be aircraft out there with over
2000 TBO which are being sold as less than 1000 TBO.


TBO is based on tach time, not Hobbs time.

Nope, it's based on time in service. You can use any reliable
means of determining the service time as far as the FAA is concerned.
(Not that TBO means anything to most of us).

  #10  
Old December 22nd 03, 04:05 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
. ..

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message

...

It scares me to think that there may be aircraft out there with over
2000 TBO which are being sold as less than 1000 TBO.


TBO is based on tach time, not Hobbs time.

Nope, it's based on time in service. You can use any reliable
means of determining the service time as far as the FAA is concerned.
(Not that TBO means anything to most of us).


What "time" are you referring to? Years/months?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) Alan Pendley Instrument Flight Rules 24 December 16th 04 03:16 PM
p3/95 [email protected] Military Aviation 1 September 27th 04 01:27 AM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 06:40 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 04:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.