![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Al" wrote in message news:f_doc.75065$kh4.4252186@attbi_s52... It's a fake! Hey Al, wake up.... You deduce the photo as a fake from what? The pixelation adjacent to the upper surface of the fuselage and vertical stabilizer? Better take a good look at the area above the tree lines -- with your grand analysis, the lower part of the picture has been 'photoshopped' as well -- and the cars on the highway, and the signs. What sort of photometric instruments did you use to determine the shadow angles are wrong? What is the geometry of the scene? What is the slant range to the aircraft and the shadows? What is the ephemeric time of day? What is the precise heading angle of the aircraft? The precise pointing angle of the camera? What is the focal length of the lens used? What is the original image size? Those are most of the questions I need answered before I could do any analysis. Back to the artifacts that you so uneducatedly rely on. Did you notice the resolution of the image on the website? Did you see 79Kb? I have no doubt you did your research using one of the many fine photo manipulator that can be purchased of under $39. Then magnified the already poor resolution until it looked like crap. Use one of the super photos you have in your stock, of any subject. Then change the pixel image size to 640 horizontal pixels at 79KB resolution.ow do the same thing you did to the photo from the website. Then go kick you dog for 'photoshopping' your picture. Warmest regards, Casey Wilson Professional Photographer [former image analyst for DoD] |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 12 May 2004 01:00:43 +0000, Casey Wilson wrote:
"Al" wrote in message news:f_doc.75065$kh4.4252186@attbi_s52... It's a fake! Hey Al, wake up.... You deduce the photo as a fake from what? The pixelation adjacent to the upper surface of the fuselage and vertical stabilizer? Better take a good look at the area above the tree lines -- with your grand analysis, the lower part of the picture has been 'photoshopped' as well -- and the cars on the highway, and the signs. What sort of photometric instruments did you use to determine the shadow angles are wrong? What is the geometry of the scene? What is the slant range to the aircraft and the shadows? What is the ephemeric time of day? What is the precise heading angle of the aircraft? The precise pointing angle of the camera? What is the focal length of the lens used? What is the original image size? Those are most of the questions I need answered before I could do any analysis. Back to the artifacts that you so uneducatedly rely on. Did you notice the resolution of the image on the website? Did you see 79Kb? I have no doubt you did your research using one of the many fine photo manipulator that can be purchased of under $39. Then magnified the already poor resolution until it looked like crap. Use one of the super photos you have in your stock, of any subject. Then change the pixel image size to 640 horizontal pixels at 79KB resolution.ow do the same thing you did to the photo from the website. Then go kick you dog for 'photoshopping' your picture. Warmest regards, Casey Wilson Professional Photographer [former image analyst for DoD] BTW, there is a 250k version freely available, which is what I was looking at. If you're a member, it seems an even larger version is available. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Casey Wilson" wrote in message
Hey Al, wake up.... You deduce the photo as a fake from what? Casey, calm down. Al's on your side here. From what I can tell, his tongue was so firmly planted in his cheek he nearly bit it in half. ![]() -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Al" writes:
It's a fake! They're all fakes, how can something that heavy be suspended in the air? Sheesh.... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Fry" wrote in message
They're all fakes, how can something that heavy be suspended in the air? Sheesh.... http://www.airliners.net/open.file/459573/L/ and big enough to drive a truck into ;-) HECTOP PP-ASEL-IA http://www.maxho.com maxho_at_maxho.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
you could probably fit a pool table in that cockpit if you move the chairs
;-) http://www.airliners.net/open.file/419103/L/ HECTOP PP-ASEL-IA http://www.maxho.com maxho_at_maxho.com "HECTOP" wrote in message ... http://www.airliners.net/open.file/573107/M/ HECTOP PP-ASEL-IA http://www.maxho.com maxho_at_maxho.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stop The Noise petitions FAA to increase N number size | Earl Grieda | Piloting | 19 | April 26th 04 05:46 AM |
| Former Air Force official pleads guilty to conspiracy in Boeing matter | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 01:16 AM |
| Puget Sound TFRs reduced in size - charted here | David H | Owning | 3 | January 10th 04 07:01 AM |
| Puget Sound TFRs reduced in size, turned into National Security Areas | C J Campbell | Piloting | 4 | January 10th 04 07:01 AM |
| Trike wing bolt size | Aaron Smith | Home Built | 0 | September 30th 03 04:02 AM |