![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , "C J Campbell"
wrote: We get foggy here at Tacoma Narrows this time of year (which is the reason I post more on these groups in the winter than in the summer). One thing we see a lot of is guys who fly the ILS too fast. I have no problem with flying the ILS at 90 or 100 knots if the ceiling is well above minimums, but it seems to me that if the ceiling is 200 feet overcast you ought to be flying the approach slowly enough that you can land at that speed. You don't need to configure for a short field landing, but you are not going to slow from 90 knots to 60 in a Skyhawk in only 200 feet of altitude, especially if you can't risk ballooning back up into the soup. otoh - I can slow my cherokee 140 down from 90 knots at the middle marker to a good landing speed at the GIP. I know I can do it because that's the way I've done every single ILS approach and that was the way I was taught from day one. ymmv -- Bob Noel |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"C J Campbell" wrote...
I have no problem with flying the ILS at 90 or 100 knots if the ceiling is well above minimums, but it seems to me that if the ceiling is 200 feet overcast you ought to be flying the approach slowly enough that you can land at that speed. You don't need to configure for a short field landing, but you are not going to slow from 90 knots to 60 in a Skyhawk in only 200 feet of altitude, especially if you can't risk ballooning back up into the soup. I think you may need to practice your ILS approaches, especially the transition to visual and landing. The transition to visual is very difficult -- probably moreso than flying the needles. Try flying ILS approaches in full VMC conditions -- not even a hood -- but with a safety pilot or instructor aboard. Let the outside stuff distract you from your instrument scan, and force yourself to look back inside. Practice the transition to visual at 200', including the power reduction, decel, flaps (if you use more to land than you use in the approach), and flare. It is NOT the same as your normal VFR landing, and it DOES require specific practice. When you get proficient, only then should you attempt to fly when the weather is anywhere near minimums. Two lessons he 1) If the field is really at minimums, you have 200 feet to slow down to landing speed. That is not much time. Better you should be ready to land before you break out. Nope -- not unless you are flying a Cat III certified airplane. You should be ready to transition to land AFTER you break out! A C172 at 90 knots is only descending at 400-500 FPM. At 200' AGL, you have 20-30 seconds until touchdown, even if you don't flare at all! You can do a lot of decelerating, reconfiguring, and flaring in 20 seconds. Since the only reconfiguring you should have to do, if any, is final flaps, you have plenty of time! 2) If you decide to go missed, then go missed. Don't change your mind just because you got a glimpse of the runway as you were flying overhead. That is good advice. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John R Weiss" wrote:
You can do a lot of decelerating, reconfiguring, and flaring in 20 seconds. Since the only reconfiguring you should have to do, if any, is final flaps, you have plenty of time! Pulling the power back to idle might be nice too :-) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roy Smith" wrote...
Since the only reconfiguring you should have to do, if any, is final flaps, you have plenty of time! Pulling the power back to idle might be nice too :-) I consider that part of the 'stick and throttle' part of flying that is done constantly, not "reconfiguring," which is done a couple times per flight. Besides, some airplanes don't take well to idle at 200' (including my current 744)... ;-) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:OSzPb.98715$5V2.327271@attbi_s53... "Roy Smith" wrote... Pulling the power back to idle might be nice too :-) Besides, some airplanes don't take well to idle at 200' (including my current 744)... ;-) If you brought it in 50% faster than normal, it might well do... Paul |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Paul Sengupta" wrote...
Besides, some airplanes don't take well to idle at 200' (including my current 744)... ;-) If you brought it in 50% faster than normal, it might well do... Can only do a missed approach in that situation -- goes against the "stabilized approach" rule... :-) |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article OSzPb.98715$5V2.327271@attbi_s53,
"John R Weiss" wrote: "Roy Smith" wrote... Since the only reconfiguring you should have to do, if any, is final flaps, you have plenty of time! Pulling the power back to idle might be nice too :-) I consider that part of the 'stick and throttle' part of flying that is done constantly, not "reconfiguring," which is done a couple times per flight. I s'pose. But you really shouldn't be playing with the throttle constantly either. Somewhere along the line I picked up adding "DFWTP" to my ILS checklist. DFWTP at GS intercept, GUMPS at DH. It stands for "Don't F*** With The Power". |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
GUMPS at DH
You don't mean a GUMPs check at decision height, do you? I want everything checked well before decision height so there's nothing to do at decision height except either land or go missed. "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... In article OSzPb.98715$5V2.327271@attbi_s53, "John R Weiss" wrote: I s'pose. But you really shouldn't be playing with the throttle constantly either. Somewhere along the line I picked up adding "DFWTP" to my ILS checklist. DFWTP at GS intercept, GUMPS at DH. It stands for "Don't F*** With The Power". |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roy Smith" wrote in message ... In article OSzPb.98715$5V2.327271@attbi_s53, "John R Weiss" wrote: "Roy Smith" wrote... Since the only reconfiguring you should have to do, if any, is final flaps, you have plenty of time! Pulling the power back to idle might be nice too :-) I consider that part of the 'stick and throttle' part of flying that is done constantly, not "reconfiguring," which is done a couple times per flight. I s'pose. Autothrottle does all that in Weiss' airplane and he slept through it. ![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmm, I was taught to use the throttle to stay on glideslope, not the elevator.
I find using the throttle results in more controllability. Roy Smith wrote: I s'pose. But you really shouldn't be playing with the throttle constantly either. Somewhere along the line I picked up adding "DFWTP" to my ILS checklist. DFWTP at GS intercept, GUMPS at DH. It stands for "Don't F*** With The Power". -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LSA Approach speeds | Ace Pilot | Home Built | 0 | February 3rd 04 06:38 PM |
| How much protection on approach? | Michael | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 15th 04 06:58 PM |
| Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 06:20 AM |
| Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 06:22 PM |
| IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 10:03 PM |