A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th 06, 06:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:51:58 -0500, "JohnH"
wrote in ::

Why is that?


The convention is probably a result of the way a weather vane works;
the arrowhead points into the wind, so a compass rose placed under it
indicates the direction of the wind's origin.

  #2  
Old January 5th 06, 06:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?

The convention is probably a result of the way a weather vane works;

I'd say the opposite - the vane is designed that way because we're
interested in where the hot air came from.

One could easily design a vane that worked the other way.

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old January 5th 06, 06:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:49:51 GMT, Jose
wrote in ::

One could easily design a vane that worked the other way.


How would you do that?
  #4  
Old January 5th 06, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?

Make the arrowhead really big and mount the thing by the tail.

Tie a piece of string on a stick and see which way it points.

  #5  
Old January 6th 06, 02:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?

On 5 Jan 2006 10:01:48 -0800, "Tony" wrote in
.com::

Make the arrowhead really big and mount the thing by the tail.

Tie a piece of string on a stick and see which way it points.


I know how to do it. I just wanted to see if Jose did.
  #6  
Old January 5th 06, 11:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

How would you do that?


The shape doesn't matter. All that's required is greater surface area on
the downwind side of the pivot point.


  #7  
Old January 6th 06, 03:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:44:35 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in
. net::


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .

How would you do that?


The shape doesn't matter. All that's required is greater surface area on
the downwind side of the pivot point.


So the placement of the pivot point is immaterial?

  #8  
Old January 5th 06, 11:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?


"Jose" wrote in message
. ..

I'd say the opposite - the vane is designed that way because we're
interested in where the hot air came from.

One could easily design a vane that worked the other way.


Most weather vanes I've seen are of the simple arrow type. A weather vane
of that type that pointed the other way would be counterintuitive, the arrow
would be "flying" backward.


  #9  
Old January 5th 06, 11:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?


One could easily design a vane that worked the other way.


Most weather vanes I've seen are of the simple arrow type. A weather
vane of that type that pointed the other way would be
counterintuitive, the arrow would be "flying" backward.


In which case is a windsock confusing?

If we used standard vectors, the tail could be arrow shaped, lose the tail
and save 50% in parts costs


  #10  
Old January 6th 06, 12:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is wind directon expressed as "FROM"?


"JohnH" wrote in message
...

In which case is a windsock confusing?


None that I can think of.



If we used standard vectors, the tail could be arrow shaped, lose the tail
and save 50% in parts costs


If you lose the tail you lose the ability to estimate wind speed from the
windsock.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 04:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 03:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 12:35 PM
Headwinds, always Paul kgyy Piloting 36 June 9th 05 02:05 AM
LX4000 wind calculation AttentionLEcureuil Soaring 2 June 23rd 04 05:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.