![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Blair Maynard wrote:
I think the assumption would be at the other end the A/C is significantly lighter because of all the fuel it has burned to get there. Which means, if it can land, it should be able to leave with the same load. Now, if they load it up outbound with more (to take advantage of the reduced fuel load) or if they gas it up, it might not make it out of a higher location. It would be interesting seeing the V-22 in Afghanistan. It certainly should be able to fly high in airplane mode (25,000 feet), but landing would be a problem. It has high loading of its props in heli mode so presumably the thin air at High Alt would make it more difficult to land as a normal heli, or at least make it take light payloads. It is also a very short takeoff and landing aircraft. -HJC |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reamed out by Approach | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 26 | March 29th 05 01:32 AM |
| Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 03:39 AM |
| Naval Aviators | jsmith | Piloting | 1 | March 25th 04 03:56 PM |
| Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 11:13 PM |
| Who do you call? | Travis Marlatte | Piloting | 4 | August 21st 03 09:16 AM |