![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ray Lovinggood" wrote in message ... Suppose I'm flying along straight and level and I feel the left wingtip rise. Where is the thermal? Is it on the left and is it lifting the wing? Or, is the right wing in sink and the wing is being pushed down? Does that mean there is a thermal further to the right and the sink that pushed my wing down is the sink that surrounds the thermal? Which way should I turn? For me, the answer is sometimes straight forward: Turn the way my friends are turning because they got there sooner than me! Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA At 10:48 06 September 2006, Flying_Monkey wrote: Yes, Frank, please explain this to us. I never heard that that there was any other theory than turn toward the uplifted wing. Sure, there's lots of theories about what to do after that. Bob Wander's 'book' has the 4-circle search method, and it seems like I read something in Knauff's stuff somewhere, maybe in 'Breaking the Apron Strings.' I'm still early in the learning process, and seem to have the best results with 'tighten the turn in decreasing lift, loosen the turn in increasing lift. This works so well that I'm frequently seeing people in roughly equal gliders climbing past me, so I'm always looking for a better way. Enlighten us. Thanks, Ed wrote: Really? I had never heard of the 'turn away from the thermal' school of thought. Frank Whiteley wrote: Regarding apparent rising wings, that may not indicate anything regarding the direction of the core of the thermal, other than a turn may indicated. That is, there is another school of thought on which way to turn, especially if the goal is to center as quickly as possible in a thermal. Frank Whiteley The only way is up. Normally the thermal is the opposite way to the way you turn. You guys must be coming towards winter tonight we are having our first taste of summer thunderstorm in Sydney. Summer bush fires blow fly's dust and 10 knot plus thermals bring it on. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gee, thanks, Ray. :-)
I think it's safe to assume in this discussion that we're talking about flying alone. If there are other gliders in a thermal, we're required for many reasons to turn in the same direction that they're turning, and the presence of other gliders gives us a good idea where to look for the center. I have my best performance when I can use my neighbors as thermal indicators. :-) But this is a serious question. How can I improve my performance centering thermals? Are all thermals surrounded by this ring of sink you mention? And what if I fly straight into the middle of a thermal, so that there's no lifted wing? What's the best technique to use then? And what about speeds. Lets say I'm flying a Standard class glider, with a min sink in the mid 40s and a best L/D of 38 at around 57 kt. What should I be thermalling at in a typical eastern thermal? And what angle of bank? I typically try to use around 45 degrees, but it isn't constant until I get the thermal fairly well centered. TIA (Thanks in advance), Ed Ray Lovinggood wrote: Suppose I'm flying along straight and level and I feel the left wingtip rise. Where is the thermal? Is it on the left and is it lifting the wing? Or, is the right wing in sink and the wing is being pushed down? Does that mean there is a thermal further to the right and the sink that pushed my wing down is the sink that surrounds the thermal? Which way should I turn? For me, the answer is sometimes straight forward: Turn the way my friends are turning because they got there sooner than me! Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
ContestID67 wrote:
I was sent a link to a gadget some college engineers-in-the-making built. http://engenius.sece.rmit.edu.au/Abstracts/Page601.htm. It tries to detect which way a thermal is based on temperature differences between wing tips. Bright boys. I have two questions; 1) Have there been other gadgets created to do the same thing? How well did they work? 2) What do you use to determine if the thermal is on the left or the right? This is the wing up or down when its near the thermal debate. Thanks, John Nothing new there, That system has been tried at least 25 years ago. It intrigued me, as an electronics engineer just beginning to fly, but the consensus of the "big boys" at the time was it wouldn't be sufficiently accurate or too sensitive to random variations or some other problems. ...lew... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lew Hartswick wrote:
ContestID67 wrote: I was sent a link to a gadget some college engineers-in-the-making built. http://engenius.sece.rmit.edu.au/Abstracts/Page601.htm. It tries to detect which way a thermal is based on temperature differences between wing tips. Bright boys. I have two questions; 1) Have there been other gadgets created to do the same thing? How well did they work? 2) What do you use to determine if the thermal is on the left or the right? This is the wing up or down when its near the thermal debate. Thanks, John Nothing new there, That system has been tried at least 25 years ago. It intrigued me, as an electronics engineer just beginning to fly, but the consensus of the "big boys" at the time was it wouldn't be sufficiently accurate or too sensitive to random variations or some other problems. It might be more practical with today's sensors, far greater computing power, and electronic attitude indicators that might let you remove temperature changes caused by bank angle. Or maybe there is a cheap lidar unit that can detect nearby air motion: mount 3 of them in the cockpit, pointed in different directions, and maybe get a clue about where the air is going up and down. -- Note: email address new as of 9/4/2006 Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA "Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lew Hartswick wrote: ContestID67 wrote: I was sent a link to a gadget some college engineers-in-the-making built. http://engenius.sece.rmit.edu.au/Abstracts/Page601.htm. It tries to detect which way a thermal is based on temperature differences between wing tips. Bright boys. I have two questions; 1) Have there been other gadgets created to do the same thing? How well did they work? 2) What do you use to determine if the thermal is on the left or the right? This is the wing up or down when its near the thermal debate. Thanks, John Nothing new there, That system has been tried at least 25 years ago. It intrigued me, as an electronics engineer just beginning to fly, but the consensus of the "big boys" at the time was it wouldn't be sufficiently accurate or too sensitive to random variations or some other problems. ...lew... This measurement technique has never been shown to even work, let alone be supperior to existing variometers (which it would have to be by a large margin to justify running wiring thru our wings, although that might be done by the manufacturer; but they won't do it unless there is a demand for the device). Personally, I think there are other methods that will work significantly better than present technology that don't require you to run wiring in your wings (which would have to be connected and disconnected every time you assemble/disassemble, which, in turn, requires an additional preflight inspection). On the direction to turn: at the last convention I listened to Tom Knauff declare that most glider pilots don't know which way to turn into a thermal; the correct direction, according to Knauff, is towards the down wing because sinking air surrounds a thermal. I am like Eric - I turn towards the up wing. If Knauff is correct, I should be missing the thermal (on the 1st turn) well over half of the time, and I am not. Most of the time I do not immediately commit to the turn (of course, there is occassionally those 10 kt monsters where there is question), and actually like to turn slightly away from the direction that I think the thermal is. The concept here is to find the boundary of the thermal and to stay inside of it; if you search for the center of the thermal I think you will end up flying thru it and turning too late, forcing the glider into the sinking air around the thermal. Once I know where the boundary is I turn into the thermal, gradually tightening the turn until I am getting optimum climb. Ideally with this technique you will seldom fly thru the center of the thermal, making it easier to center the glider in the thermal. This is also helpful in identifying streeting, since you turn only once you detect that the lift is definitely falling off. Tom Seim Richland, WA |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
At 18:36 06 September 2006, Eric Greenwell wrote:
I also turn right most of the time, suggesting most thermals occur on the right side of my glider, and I think there are good reasons for that. OK I'll bite. What good reasons do you have? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary Evans wrote:
At 18:36 06 September 2006, Eric Greenwell wrote: I also turn right most of the time, suggesting most thermals occur on the right side of my glider, and I think there are good reasons for that. OK I'll bite. What good reasons do you have? I thought you'd never ask! Part of it is some of the thermals will be entered close enough to center that both wings will rise (20% of them?); in that case, I circle in my favorite direction. So, if I just flew randomly about, I'd be circling 40% to the left and 60% to the right. But, I don't fly randomly: I often have a good idea of where the lift is (cloud, bird, ridge, dust devil), so I fly slightly to the left of it. That ups the percentage of thermals on the right (or center) to about 80% overall. -- Note: email address new as of 9/4/2006 Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA "Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is a way to solve two problems with one action:
When you approach the thermal drop a lot of aluminum confetti. When you circle around, just fly to the spot that is climbing. At the same time, the radar operator will spot you on the screen so jets can avoid you. The problem I have yet to solve is the littering - but you cannot have everything. Maybe the confetti can be coupons that can be redeemed and the nearby store operator will pay you to drop them. I am putting my broken aircraft back together and need to get back in the air - going stir crazy. Colin |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree.
Given that you are in an area of likely lift. Training stage 1 seems to be how to stay in the thermal when you are already in it. Training stage 2 seems to be how to centre in the thermal when you have found it. Training stage 3 seems to be how to decide which thermal to centre in when you are in a likely area. I have flown a number of legs with Justin Wills on Competition Enterprise and it is interesting to see our different responses when we reach the same cloud to climb. I find a good thermal and start centreing like mad, whilst Justin seems to wander off exploring the area. When I approach an area already full of other gliders, I will often look around before joining their thermal. I often wonder when I meet a thermal whether my first reaction should be to concentrate on centreing or check that I am in the right place, often I do the daft thing of first centreing then exploring then re-centreing which is probably not very efficient. As for the Immelman, this seems to result from a pull-up from 80kts+ in neg flap to 50kts in positive flap and a near stall in order to roll the glider rapidly into the turn. Difficult to achieve in the company of others. I am increasingly concerned at my own ability even to manage stage 1. Rory Author: Bill Daniels bildan@comcast-dot-net Date/Time: 20:00 06 September 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------ Or, as I've seen in OLC .igc files by top pilots, fly straight through the thermal to evaluate it, then turn 270 degrees AWAY from the side where they think the thermal is and then reverse turn direction thus placing the final circle two turn diameters back on track offset to the side where the strongest lift was. The emphasis seems to be good thermal selection vs. fast centering. Alternatively, at least one pilot will sometimes perform what must be a modified Immelmann since the course reversal, as seen on SeeYou's map view, is a zero-radius turn while gaining 800 feet in the pull-up. This entry showed an 80 knot IAS reduction in 12 seconds. However, it's more likely these guys don't use any specific maneuver - they just KNOW where the lift is and they're not shy about going for it. Bill Daniels |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
ContestID67 wrote:
I was sent a link to a gadget some college engineers-in-the-making built. http://engenius.sece.rmit.edu.au/Abstracts/Page601.htm. It tries to detect which way a thermal is based on temperature differences between wing tips. Bright boys. I have two questions; 1) Have there been other gadgets created to do the same thing? How well did they work? Dear Sir: Look at the Themi: http://www.themi.de/Themi%20Centering%20Device.htm And, I've been told that the Zander flight computer -- http://www.zander-variometer.de/ -- has similar capability, but don't see evidence of this on their web site. After hearing about the Themi, I *had* to buy one to see how it works. Having said that, I have been using one for 2 years, and have some experience with it -- it's a fun toy -- but I"ve been unable to find any description of how it operates. Some things are obvious: It has a GPS engine, and probably has a barometric sensor and/or accelerometers. In any case, the maximum it coiuld do is to use 3-D GPS data to calculate climb/descent; it could have accelerometers as well; and sense pressure changes. It could calculate, therefore, the movement of the glider, make some assumptions about flight, calculate wind, and on this basis estimate where the best lift *was* so you can go back to it. In my experience, if I fly in non-erratic circles, it does a pretty good job of re-finding the last spots of lift after I've wandered away fruitlessly looking for something better, and in doing this it seems to compensate for wind. Obviously, it can't predict the future, so I use my own judgment on where lift is *going* to be. It is useful? After 2 years with it, I do feel that I'm better than it is. I look at the ground and the cloud (if any) and think about the wind (my SN-10 is invaluable in this regard -- http://www.ilec-gmbh.com/sn10.htm ) and am reliably able to find lift. But -- in weak or windy conditions, or when, as sometimes happens, I lose my mental image of the thermal and where I've been, I will somtimes turn my brain off for a couple of minutes and just "fly the lights," and more often than not get back into lift. I do wish that someone who knows the theory behind this gadget would speak about this, as it would help me understand how best to fly with it. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Themi thermal locator | John Jones | Soaring | 5 | April 30th 04 05:16 AM |
| For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Rotorcraft | 0 | April 29th 04 09:29 PM |
| For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | General Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 09:09 PM |
| Spin on thermal entry - how-to | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 0 | January 29th 04 06:43 PM |
| Thermal to Wave contact! | C.Fleming | Soaring | 1 | January 21st 04 02:54 PM |