![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Logajan wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote: Jim Logajan writes: Most everyone agrees that keeping the coffee in the cup is possible. What some people don't seem to believe is possible is that the force felt by the pilot (or tea/coffee) can be 1 gee during the entire roll. They believe it has to vary during the roll. I'm hesitant to name names. ;-) It has to vary during the roll, because the constant 1 G acceleration due to gravity does not change. The net acceleration of the aircraft must always be at least one G in consequence, and if the aircraft begins a climb or ends a descent, it _must_ be greater than +1.0 G. Sigh. Yes, the force that is felt is greater then one g-force at the beginning and end of the maneuver. But that is not the case "during the roll" itself. Again, as in the other post of yours I responded to, you appear to be confusing force and acceleration. Well, if you can't begin and end the roll, then you can't do a roll. Arguing that you can omit these phases of the roll is simply silly. That is like saying that you can do a spin without stalling since stalling is just the entrance to the spin, not the spin itself. Matt |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:24:02 -0000, Jim Logajan
wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: Jim Logajan writes: Most everyone agrees that keeping the coffee in the cup is possible. What some people don't seem to believe is possible is that the force felt by the pilot (or tea/coffee) can be 1 gee during the entire roll. They believe it has to vary during the roll. I'm hesitant to name names. ;-) It has to vary during the roll, because the constant 1 G acceleration due to gravity does not change. The net acceleration of the aircraft must always be at least one G in consequence, and if the aircraft begins a climb or ends a descent, it _must_ be greater than +1.0 G. Sigh. Yes, the force that is felt is greater then one g-force at the beginning and end of the maneuver. But that is not the case "during the roll" itself. Again, as in the other post of yours I responded to, you appear to be confusing force and acceleration. Not a serious confusion, as force and acceleration are stricly proportional (F=mA) as long as the mass of the object (plane) is not changing. Over the time intervals involved, not enough fuel is burned to significantly change the mass. Now, if the pilot scares the s--t out of himself during the manouver, then the proportionality might not hold up. :-) --- Jay (remove dashes for legal email address) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Jim Logajan writes: Most everyone agrees that keeping the coffee in the cup is possible. What some people don't seem to believe is possible is that the force felt by the pilot (or tea/coffee) can be 1 gee during the entire roll. They believe it has to vary during the roll. I'm hesitant to name names. ;-) It has to vary during the roll, because the constant 1 G acceleration due to gravity does not change. The net acceleration of the aircraft must always be at least one G in consequence, and if the aircraft begins a climb or ends a descent, it _must_ be greater than +1.0 G. You're an idiot and you will never ever do a barrel roll. Bertie |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jun 11, 12:54 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Jim Logajan writes: Most everyone agrees that keeping the coffee in the cup is possible. What some people don't seem to believe is possible is that the force felt by the pilot (or tea/coffee) can be 1 gee during the entire roll. They believe it has to vary during the roll. I'm hesitant to name names. ;-) It has to vary during the roll, because the constant 1 G acceleration due to gravity does not change. The net acceleration of the aircraft must always be at least one G in consequence, and if the aircraft begins a climb or ends a descent, it _must_ be greater than +1.0 G. You are assuming that the center of the roll makes a straight line, that is not the case. -Robert |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robert M. Gary writes:
You are assuming that the center of the roll makes a straight line, that is not the case. I'm making no such assumption. The reality is that there will always be an acceleration of 1 G imposed on the aircraft, in the direction of the ground. There is nothing that you can do in an aircraft that will eliminate this acceleration, and there is nothing you can do in an aircraft that changes its height above the ground or its path over the ground that will not introduce additional acceleration. This is all basic physics. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Logajan wrote
Most everyone agrees that keeping the coffee in the cup is possible. What some people don't seem to believe is possible is that the force felt by the pilot (or tea/coffee) can be 1 gee during the entire roll. They believe it has to vary during the roll. I'm hesitant to name names. ;-) My name is Bob Moore :-) Just what is a barrel roll has been debated between "Big John", Dudley, and myself at least twice in the past. It IS difficult to describe without having a model airplane in one's hand and flying it through the maneuver. How come you don't seem to belive the following from Wikipedia? Barrel roll From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the aerial sport. For the military operation, see Operation Barrel Roll. A barrel roll occurs when an object (usually an airplane or roller coaster) makes a complete rotation on its longitudinal axis while following a helical path, approximately maintaining its original direction. The G load is kept positive (but not constant) on the aircraft throughout the maneuver, commonly not more than 2-3 G. In aviation, the maneuver includes a constant variation of attitude in all three axes, and at the midpoint (top) of the roll, the aircraft is flying inverted, with the nose pointing at a 90-degree angle ("sideways") to the general path of flight. The term "barrel roll" is frequently used, incorrectly, to refer to any roll by an airplane (see aileron roll), or to a helical roll in which the nose remains pointed generally along the flight path. In fact, the barrel roll is a specific and difficult maneuver; a combination of a roll and a loop. It is not used in aerobatic competition. From: http://acro.harvard.edu The Barrel Roll is a not competition maneuver. The barrel roll is a combination between a loop and a roll. You complete one loop while completing one roll at the same time. The flight path during a barrel roll has the shape of a horizontal cork screw. Imagine a big barrel, with the airplanes wheels rolling along the inside of the barrel in a cork screw path. During a barrel roll, the pilot experiences always positive G's. The maximum is about 2.5 to 3 G, the minimum about 0.5 G. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Moore" wrote in message 46.128... My name is Bob Moore :-) Just what is a barrel roll has been debated between "Big John", Dudley, and myself at least twice in the past. It IS difficult to describe without having a model airplane in one's hand and flying it through the maneuver. How come you don't seem to belive the following from Wikipedia? Barrel roll From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the aerial sport. For the military operation, see Operation Barrel Roll. A barrel roll occurs when an object (usually an airplane or roller coaster) makes a complete rotation on its longitudinal axis while following a helical path, approximately maintaining its original direction. The G load is kept positive (but not constant) on the aircraft throughout the maneuver, commonly not more than 2-3 G. In aviation, the maneuver includes a constant variation of attitude in all three axes, and at the midpoint (top) of the roll, the aircraft is flying inverted, with the nose pointing at a 90-degree angle ("sideways") to the general path of flight. The term "barrel roll" is frequently used, incorrectly, to refer to any roll by an airplane (see aileron roll), or to a helical roll in which the nose remains pointed generally along the flight path. In fact, the barrel roll is a specific and difficult maneuver; a combination of a roll and a loop. It is not used in aerobatic competition. From: http://acro.harvard.edu The Barrel Roll is a not competition maneuver. The barrel roll is a combination between a loop and a roll. You complete one loop while completing one roll at the same time. The flight path during a barrel roll has the shape of a horizontal cork screw. Imagine a big barrel, with the airplanes wheels rolling along the inside of the barrel in a cork screw path. During a barrel roll, the pilot experiences always positive G's. The maximum is about 2.5 to 3 G, the minimum about 0.5 G. Then would you label the roll that Jim has described here as a form of aileron roll, instead of a barrel roll? Or do you think it is possible to do a 1g aileron roll? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Maxwell" wrote in
: "Bob Moore" wrote in message 46.128... My name is Bob Moore :-) Just what is a barrel roll has been debated between "Big John", Dudley, and myself at least twice in the past. It IS difficult to describe without having a model airplane in one's hand and flying it through the maneuver. How come you don't seem to belive the following from Wikipedia? Barrel roll From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the aerial sport. For the military operation, see Operation Barrel Roll. A barrel roll occurs when an object (usually an airplane or roller coaster) makes a complete rotation on its longitudinal axis while following a helical path, approximately maintaining its original direction. The G load is kept positive (but not constant) on the aircraft throughout the maneuver, commonly not more than 2-3 G. In aviation, the maneuver includes a constant variation of attitude in all three axes, and at the midpoint (top) of the roll, the aircraft is flying inverted, with the nose pointing at a 90-degree angle ("sideways") to the general path of flight. The term "barrel roll" is frequently used, incorrectly, to refer to any roll by an airplane (see aileron roll), or to a helical roll in which the nose remains pointed generally along the flight path. In fact, the barrel roll is a specific and difficult maneuver; a combination of a roll and a loop. It is not used in aerobatic competition. From: http://acro.harvard.edu The Barrel Roll is a not competition maneuver. The barrel roll is a combination between a loop and a roll. You complete one loop while completing one roll at the same time. The flight path during a barrel roll has the shape of a horizontal cork screw. Imagine a big barrel, with the airplanes wheels rolling along the inside of the barrel in a cork screw path. During a barrel roll, the pilot experiences always positive G's. The maximum is about 2.5 to 3 G, the minimum about 0.5 G. Then would you label the roll that Jim has described here as a form of aileron roll, instead of a barrel roll? Or do you think it is possible to do a 1g aileron roll? It's less of a roll than it is a loop. In fact, that's how I used to teach it. Get a hula hoop, cut it and pull the ends apart. you are now looking at the path of a barrel roll. A skewed loop Bertie |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Moore wrote:
Jim Logajan wrote Most everyone agrees that keeping the coffee in the cup is possible. What some people don't seem to believe is possible is that the force felt by the pilot (or tea/coffee) can be 1 gee during the entire roll. They believe it has to vary during the roll. I'm hesitant to name names. ;-) My name is Bob Moore :-) Hi Bob. Glad you could make it to B.R.A. (Barrel Rollers Anonymous.) :-) Just what is a barrel roll has been debated between "Big John", Dudley, and myself at least twice in the past. It IS difficult to describe without having a model airplane in one's hand and flying it through the maneuver. How come you don't seem to belive the following from Wikipedia? You know what is odd? The flight path of the maneuver I wrote about appears to violate the Harvard definition you quote (it can't be done in a straight horizontal path - my corkscrew/helical path must follow a parabolic arc) but oddly the Wikipedia definition leaves me a big "out." Straight down. ;-) Drop the nose straight down so as to make the plane & pilot weightless. Then start doing horizontal loops so the centrifugal force yields the equivalent of one gravity of weight. At least the longitudinal axis of the helical path will maintain a constant direction - but the pilot will quickly be screwed. :-) Barrel roll From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the aerial sport. For the military operation, see Operation Barrel Roll. A barrel roll occurs when an object (usually an airplane or roller coaster) makes a complete rotation on its longitudinal axis while following a helical path, approximately maintaining its original direction. The G load is kept positive (but not constant) on the aircraft throughout the maneuver, commonly not more than 2-3 G. In aviation, the maneuver includes a constant variation of attitude in all three axes, and at the midpoint (top) of the roll, the aircraft is flying inverted, with the nose pointing at a 90-degree angle ("sideways") to the general path of flight. The term "barrel roll" is frequently used, incorrectly, to refer to any roll by an airplane (see aileron roll), or to a helical roll in which the nose remains pointed generally along the flight path. In fact, the barrel roll is a specific and difficult maneuver; a combination of a roll and a loop. It is not used in aerobatic competition. From: http://acro.harvard.edu The Barrel Roll is a not competition maneuver. The barrel roll is a combination between a loop and a roll. You complete one loop while completing one roll at the same time. The flight path during a barrel roll has the shape of a horizontal cork screw. Imagine a big barrel, with the airplanes wheels rolling along the inside of the barrel in a cork screw path. During a barrel roll, the pilot experiences always positive G's. The maximum is about 2.5 to 3 G, the minimum about 0.5 G. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Logajan writes:
Drop the nose straight down so as to make the plane & pilot weightless. Then start doing horizontal loops so the centrifugal force yields the equivalent of one gravity of weight. The total force on the aircraft will still be above 1 G unless the entire loop is in free fall. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dispelling the Myth: Hillary Clinton and the Purple Heart | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 21st 06 06:41 AM |
| Impossible to ditch in a field (almost) | mindenpilot | Piloting | 29 | December 12th 04 12:45 AM |
| bush: impossible to be AWOL (do vets give a sh!t) | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | September 8th 04 05:20 PM |
| cheap, durable, homebuilt aircrafts- myth or truth? | -=:|SAJAN|:=- | Home Built | 27 | January 8th 04 10:05 AM |
| The myth that won't die. | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | December 19th 03 07:15 PM |