Why must night landings be full-stop?

wrote in
:

On Mar 15, 9:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote
:

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:51:32 -0700 (PDT), Tina
wrote:

What is the definition of a takeoff and landing anyway?

It seems the FAA intentionally omitted those terms from the
Pilot/Controller Glossary:

A netkkkop AND a conspirawhacko. YOu're a man of many talents, there,
Larry.

Bertie

Define "man" and "talents" please Herr Bunyip.
#


in the facetious sense, of course.



Grazie.

Richard
(I believe using either and esp. both in the same sentence to describe
anything to do with Mr. D to be an example of faulty thinking).

True enough.


Bertie

"Tina" wrote in message ...
What is the definition of a takeoff and landing anyway? On a long
runway in a 172 one could land on the numbers, get below flying
speed, add throttle and lift off and repeat that sequence a number of
times in a single pass. Is each such touch and go an FAA recognized
landing and take off?



Sure, why not?

In article ,
says...


Anyone know why landings for night currency have to be to a full stop?

rg

It's true we can only surmise as to the wisdom behind the regulations.
I always assumed the night full-stop requirement was to ensure that night
currency also included night-time ground taxi currency, which is much
more complicated than day-time.

"Airbus" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...


It's true we can only surmise as to the wisdom behind the regulations.


Or that there is wisdom behind the regulations.

On Mar 16, 12:19 am, Airbus wrote:
In article ,
says...



Anyone know why landings for night currency have to be to a full stop?

rg

It's true we can only surmise as to the wisdom behind the regulations.
I always assumed the night full-stop requirement was to ensure that night
currency also included night-time ground taxi currency, which is much
more complicated than day-time.

If that were the case, then the regulations would exclude stop-and-
go's, which do not require any taxiing whatsoever.

buttman wrote in
:

On Mar 16, 12:19 am, Airbus wrote:
In article ,
says...



Anyone know why landings for night currency have to be to a full
stop?

rg

It's true we can only surmise as to the wisdom behind the
regulations. I always assumed the night full-stop requirement was to
ensure that night currency also included night-time ground taxi
currency, which is much more complicated than day-time.

If that were the case, then the regulations would exclude stop-and-
go's, which do not require any taxiing whatsoever.


Yeah, right.

Bertie