![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:CxhIj.100583$yE1.59010@attbi_s21: That you think XM absolves you of the hard work of comprehending the weather and being able to predict it's effect on your flight is downright scary. My, you are an absolutist, aren't you? What has made you believe that simply because I own and use XM weather that I think that it "absolves me of comprehending the weather"? It doesn't, but since you obviously don;'t comprehend the weather, you obviously do believe it. Bertie |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 31, 10:58 pm, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
That you think XM absolves you of the hard work of comprehending the weather and being able to predict it's effect on your flight is downright scary. My, you are an absolutist, aren't you? What has made you believe that simply because I own and use XM weather that I think that it "absolves me of comprehending the weather"? Yeah -- I'm absolutely convinced you are relying on XM to provide you guidance that you -- as a VFR pilot -- should not and can not rely upon. Yes I have a 496 with XM. I use it for IFR flight. So please tell me which XM Data display you use to ensure you maintain VFR conditions? (Hint: There is none.) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan" wrote ... Every once in a while you say something that makes me think, "Ok, this guy might get it." And then this... Weather? Easy? If you think XM is gonna save your ass as a VFR only pilot,..... Dan, Friendly advice,... relax. You're on your way to usenet burnout. State your opinion and move along,... nobody likes a ball hog at the dunktank. ;-) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 31, 11:20 pm, "Mike Isaksen" wrote:
State your opinion and move along,... nobody likes a ball hog at the dunktank. OK, so that was funny -- When are you gonna wind up and throw? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:20:55 GMT, Mike Isaksen wrote:
"Dan" wrote ... Every once in a while you say something that makes me think, "Ok, this guy might get it." And then this... Weather? Easy? If you think XM is gonna save your ass as a VFR only pilot,..... Dan, Friendly advice,... relax. You're on your way to usenet burnout. State your opinion and move along,... nobody likes a ball hog at the dunktank. ;-) Mike, I apologize and take my share of the blame. Dan follows me around, which is my fault, I call him My Little Trick Pony and Oh Boy does it get under his fur, er skin. http://tinyurl.com/2emark He has promised to retrieve the newsreader he wrote in 1983. I gave him a list of free newsservers, he will be killfiling me. Soon, all this will be over ![]() I appreciate your patience with My Little Trick Pony. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:l0hIj.100539$yE1.18097@attbi_s21: Before XM weather and the kind, you had to tediously transcribe information from airborne FSS weather breifings, HIWAS, etc. onto a map or your head or whatever to determine where adverse weather was. Now all the busy work is removed, so all you have to do is look at the screen and it's all there. The flying is all the same. Your weather avoidance piloting techniques are exactly the same. It's just that information you use comes to you more efficiently. It is that, and more. When you can see the weather actually developing and changing ahead on your route of flight, in nearly real-time, your understanding of the weather is increased a hundred-fold over what is possible with a pre-flight weather briefing. Your undrstanding of weather is near zilch. Before, we had to "paint the picture" in our heads, based on old, static, possibly hours-old information -- and HOPE that it hadn't changed from predicted. Now, we know. It's that easy. No it isn't, fjukkwit. Bertie |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:WsXHj.45877$TT4.30055@attbi_s22: I would NEVER have attempted that flight "pre-XM", simply because I'd be trying to paint a picture of weather in my head from a radio briefing (IF you could even get ahold of Flight Service), and you'd have no idea of the "big picture" that live XM paints so wonderfully for you. Wait -- are you serious? Completely. XM weather gives y Thanks be to God it will only be a Cherokee you destroy. Bertie |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay Honeck wrote:
I would NEVER have attempted that flight "pre-XM", simply because I'd be trying to paint a picture of weather in my head from a radio briefing (IF you could even get ahold of Flight Service), and you'd have no idea of the "big picture" that live XM paints so wonderfully for you. Wait -- are you serious? Completely. XM weather gives you a weather picture that is absolutely unparalleled in GA aircraft. Before we had it, we would have stayed in Pensacola. After we had it, the flight from Pensacola to St. Pete was completely routine. Jay, you need some remedial weather analysis and flight planning training. I've never had XM weather (OK, one flight with a friend with a 496) and get along fine without it. I'm not saying I wouldn't like to have it, but it isn't worth the cost to me. It gives a little more convenience, but I can get the same and even more information from several sources (DUAT, intellicast, weather channel, ADDS, etc., when it comes to preflight. Enroute I do fine with my eyes, ASOS/AWOS, listening to ATC and FSS. I see XM as a much more convenient tool for inflight than for preflight and can't imagine making go/no-go decisions simply because I have XM weather. Matt |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Whiting wrote in
: Jay Honeck wrote: I would NEVER have attempted that flight "pre-XM", simply because I'd be trying to paint a picture of weather in my head from a radio briefing (IF you could even get ahold of Flight Service), and you'd have no idea of the "big picture" that live XM paints so wonderfully for you. Wait -- are you serious? Completely. XM weather gives you a weather picture that is absolutely unparalleled in GA aircraft. Before we had it, we would have stayed in Pensacola. After we had it, the flight from Pensacola to St. Pete was completely routine. Jay, you need some remedial weather analysis and flight planning training. Guess that means getting back into his go kart come MSFS sim and a couple of views of "Captains of the Clouds" before he gets to go flying again... Bertie |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Completely. XM weather gives you a weather picture that is absolutely
unparalleled in GA aircraft. Before we had it, we would have stayed in Pensacola. After we had it, the flight from Pensacola to St. Pete was completely routine. Jay, you need some remedial weather analysis and flight planning training. I've never had XM weather (OK, one flight with a friend with a 496) and get along fine without it. I'm glad for that, Matt -- but this is not the conclusion Mary and I have made. BTW: Your point about using XM for preflight analysis isn't relevant, since no one uses it for that. The strength of having live weather on board is for in-flight decision making, not pre-flight briefings. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recommendation for Flight School Florida Keys | Patrick Maier | Piloting | 8 | November 5th 05 10:51 AM |
| RAS phobia cure | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 6th 05 11:43 PM |
| Need advice on flight to Cancun from Florida. | Piperflyer | Piloting | 1 | September 23rd 04 04:07 PM |
| Possible cure for the old Nvidia driver blues | Dr. Anthony J. Lomenzo | Simulators | 1 | April 1st 04 02:27 AM |
| Air Florida Flight 90 | Bertie the Bunyip | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 01:28 AM |