A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stupid hp to thrust question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 6th 03, 09:10 AM
PW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To quote Bill Clinton, "It depends on what your definition of what thrust
is"?

Damn, I've never read so much BS for a simple question.




  #2  
Old December 8th 03, 03:42 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi All, thanks for the responses, was not meant to be a trick question but
definately a newbie question. I was curious after reading about people using
mazda 13b engines for various homebuilts, and porting them, adding on
various components to boost the hp from 200 to 260+. Seems at a point that
it's overkill if the 200 hp engine is going to provide you with the needed
ponies and rpms to accomplish the same as the 260 hp engine. What would the
advantge be of having the extra horsepower ?

Thanks,

Mark


"Mark" wrote in message
...
Does a prop turning at 2300 rpm on a 150hp motor produce more thrust than

a
prop spinning 2300 rpm on a 100 hp motor ?





  #3  
Old December 8th 03, 04:28 PM
RobertR237
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Mark" writes:


Hi All, thanks for the responses, was not meant to be a trick question but
definately a newbie question. I was curious after reading about people using
mazda 13b engines for various homebuilts, and porting them, adding on
various components to boost the hp from 200 to 260+. Seems at a point that
it's overkill if the 200 hp engine is going to provide you with the needed
ponies and rpms to accomplish the same as the 260 hp engine. What would the
advantge be of having the extra horsepower ?

Thanks,

Mark



NOW you have asked the question the right way and will see some good answers.
The advantage of more horsepower is the capability of increased thrust, which
is not a factor of just the RPM but of the ability to convert the horsepower to
usable thrust using a prop geared to the output of the engine. Thrust is
created by the prop and is determined by the RPM of the prop, the length of the
blades, the number of blades and the pitch of the blades along with a host of
other factors. Assuming for one example the same number of blades, the same
RPM, the same length of blades, and other conditions for two engines and two
props, the higher horsepower engine will be able to turn a larger pitch prop
than will the lower horsepower engine and will produce more thrust.

Think of it the same way as a race care. The higher the horsepower available
from the engine, the higher the gear ratio that can be used and the faster the
top end speed.

PS: This is a simple answer to your question but many factors are involved.
The effort to increase a 200 hp engine to 260 hp may or may not be worth the
effort and the 30% increase in hp wil not produce an equilivent increase in
thrust or speed. I don't remember the formula for calculating the increase but
it is far less than anticipated.




Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

  #4  
Old December 8th 03, 05:00 PM
Eric Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"RobertR237" wrote in message
...
PS: This is a simple answer to your question but many factors are

involved.
The effort to increase a 200 hp engine to 260 hp may or may not be worth

the
effort and the 30% increase in hp wil not produce an equilivent increase

in
thrust or speed. I don't remember the formula for calculating the

increase but
it is far less than anticipated.


Speed increases at about the cube root of the HP increase, so:

(260 / 200) ^ (1 / 3) = 1.091 or about 9% faster with 30% more HP

But other factors to consider are the increased weight of a larger engine,
the increased fuel burn, and the weight of that fuel.

Eric


  #5  
Old December 8th 03, 06:03 PM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Eric Miller" wrote:

"RobertR237" wrote in message
...
PS: This is a simple answer to your question but many factors are

involved.
The effort to increase a 200 hp engine to 260 hp may or may not be worth

the
effort and the 30% increase in hp wil not produce an equilivent increase

in
thrust or speed. I don't remember the formula for calculating the

increase but
it is far less than anticipated.


Speed increases at about the cube root of the HP increase, so:

(260 / 200) ^ (1 / 3) = 1.091 or about 9% faster with 30% more HP

But other factors to consider are the increased weight of a larger engine,
the increased fuel burn, and the weight of that fuel.

Eric



Extra horsepower converts directly into rate of climb, assuming the same
weight and airspeed. Fuel consumption rises approximately in proportion
to horsepower; stability decreases.

Other factors in boosting phenomenal horsepower out of small packages:

Increased thermal load
Increased stress on all parts of the engine
Some high RPM ranges may not yield usable thrust because the prop tips
are in the transonic range, where prop efficiency decreases greatly.
  #6  
Old December 9th 03, 05:41 AM
PW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Eric Miller" wrote:

"RobertR237" wrote in message
...
PS: This is a simple answer to your question but many factors are

involved.
The effort to increase a 200 hp engine to 260 hp may or may not be

worth
the
effort and the 30% increase in hp wil not produce an equilivent

increase
in
thrust or speed. I don't remember the formula for calculating the

increase but
it is far less than anticipated.


Speed increases at about the cube root of the HP increase, so:

(260 / 200) ^ (1 / 3) = 1.091 or about 9% faster with 30% more HP

But other factors to consider are the increased weight of a larger

engine,
the increased fuel burn, and the weight of that fuel.

Eric



Extra horsepower converts directly into rate of climb, assuming the same
weight and airspeed. Fuel consumption rises approximately in proportion
to horsepower; stability decreases.

Other factors in boosting phenomenal horsepower out of small packages:

Increased thermal load
Increased stress on all parts of the engine
Some high RPM ranges may not yield usable thrust because the prop tips
are in the transonic range, where prop efficiency decreases greatly.


And in the case of a rotary, you WILL be spinning the engine around 6000 or
so RPM. This means you must also use a PSRU to drop the RPM down to
something usable for the prop. The nice thing is, 6000 shaft RPM is only
2000 rotor RPM. The 13b can handle 6-8 grand with no problems.

Phillip


  #7  
Old December 9th 03, 05:35 AM
PW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark" wrote in message
...
Hi All, thanks for the responses, was not meant to be a trick question but
definately a newbie question. I was curious after reading about people

using
mazda 13b engines for various homebuilts, and porting them, adding on
various components to boost the hp from 200 to 260+. Seems at a point that
it's overkill if the 200 hp engine is going to provide you with the

needed
ponies and rpms to accomplish the same as the 260 hp engine. What would

the
advantge be of having the extra horsepower ?

Thanks,

Mark


"Mark" wrote in message
...
Does a prop turning at 2300 rpm on a 150hp motor produce more thrust

than
a
prop spinning 2300 rpm on a 100 hp motor ?




Mark,

A "typical" 13b (non-turbocharged) for aircraft is closer to 180-200 Hp.
A turbo will get you to that 250 hp mark, if you need it. Without the right
prop, the power is not usable.


Phillip










 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid super cub question Robert Loer Home Built 9 November 22nd 03 06:28 PM
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question jlauer Home Built 7 November 16th 03 02:51 AM
question about EZRocket David O Home Built 6 October 1st 03 07:03 PM
Question on Pulsejets/Ramjets??? DarylG1532 Home Built 3 August 16th 03 04:20 AM
Question - Regarding Canard Pushers... Tilt Home Built 33 August 10th 03 12:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.