![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Margy Natalie" wrote Does anyone know if you are flying an LSA on a PP can you reposition the gear in flight? Now, all I need is a plane, a seaplane rating and probably a tail wheel endorsement. :-). Either they just changed the wording (or interpretation) of the prepositional gear for LSA amphibians, or they are about to; I don't remember which, but I have read it in the last month. -- Jim in NC |
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Morgans" wrote prepositional gear for LSA amphibians Damn spell check, used with fat fingers; I let it change repositional to prepositional when I didn't want it to. -- Jim in NC |
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
Margy Natalie wrote: This is where I think LSA will shine. I've got my PP (no instrument rating) and Ron's got his PP with IA. We've got the Navion, nice, fly fast, get there, comfy airplane. At 15 - 16 GPH it should be fast, etc. But let's face it, it's not a putz around weekend plane. Why can't you putz around with it locally? Around the local area I can run my Bo at 45% power on 8 gph indicating 145-150 mph. You'll never come out ahead adding an LSA with those numbers. |
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think they call it TBR-as in time between replacement. Not sure how many
hours. I think they're shooting for 3000, but right now I think they're under 2000 hours. mike "Blueskies" wrote in message et... As it is now there is no such thing as an overhaul on those Thielert engines. Apparently run them to 'tbo' and throw them away... |
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Newps" wrote Why can't you putz around with it locally? Around the local area I can run my Bo at 45% power on 8 gph indicating 145-150 mph. You'll never come out ahead adding an LSA with those numbers. 'Cause the Navion wants to sink, every time you try to land it on the water? g,d&r -- Jim in NC |
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
Newps wrote:
Margy Natalie wrote: This is where I think LSA will shine. I've got my PP (no instrument rating) and Ron's got his PP with IA. We've got the Navion, nice, fly fast, get there, comfy airplane. At 15 - 16 GPH it should be fast, etc. But let's face it, it's not a putz around weekend plane. Why can't you putz around with it locally? Around the local area I can run my Bo at 45% power on 8 gph indicating 145-150 mph. You'll never come out ahead adding an LSA with those numbers. 145-150 isn't putzing. I want slow, lazy, weekend hanging out. Powered Parachute would be fun too, but those can't take any wind at all. The FIB looks like fun as well. I'd prefer nothing between me and the air. Margy |
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 5, 4:30 am, "Morgans" wrote:
I wouldn't want to talk you out of anything, but light sport flying is better flying than no flying! g -- Jim in NC I have a PPL, but it's a big 10-4 on that! It could be the thing that saves all of small GA flying. As was said, some of the LSA planes are awesome, and I am sure I would love to have some of them. It's a good thing to know that as long as I have a DL, I can fly. Bud |
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
|
Morgans wrote:
"Larry Stimely" wrote No argument, but what if I'm out somewhere on a weekend, it gets dark and I can't get home? Many of the new light sport aircraft have lights for night operation. Of course, you would need a PP to fly past 30 minutes after sunset, but you can still fly the equipped LSA. Also, in California, there's always the issue of the mountains. Yes, so you fly the passes. You can fly higher as necessary to get over and though passes, if I remember correctly, and stay a thousand feet above terrain. Many of the higher performance light sport planes have the capability to fly pretty high, especially if equipped with the turbo Rotax engine, as many are. Maybe I don't need the increased flexibility of the Private ticket but I suppose it only makes financial sense to find out. I just may do that over the weekend. Some do need the extra capability, but you can always get the light sport pilot ticket, then upgrade later, if you find you need to. I wouldn't want to talk you out of anything, but light sport flying is better flying than no flying! g Yeah, I just got back from flying the Evektor Sportstar and I'm pretty well sold. My wife and I aren't rich and I just can't see blowing all that money to train in a plane that runs 100LL at 13-14 gph. I went next door and bought a Los Angeles section and VFR chart, and saw where if I decided to fly to Vegas or Laughlin...I'd need my private ticket in pretty short order. The mountains NE of Los Angeles are easily above 10000 feet and that would be a tough deal in Light Sport. What's this about a turbocharged Rotax? How about repositionable gear? Also, does anyone know what the TBO for the Rotax engine is and what it costs to overhaul them? My instructor/Light Sport sales manager didn't know. LS |
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
In rec.aviation.piloting Larry Stimely wrote:
Morgans wrote: Yeah, I just got back from flying the Evektor Sportstar and I'm pretty well sold. My wife and I aren't rich and I just can't see blowing all that money to train in a plane that runs 100LL at 13-14 gph. I went next door and bought a Los Angeles section and VFR chart, and saw where if I decided to fly to Vegas or Laughlin...I'd need my private ticket in pretty short order. The mountains NE of Los Angeles are easily above 10000 feet and that would be a tough deal in Light Sport. So you go east through the Cajon pass. The highest point in the pass is about 4000 feet. At VFR altitudes, that's 5500 and 6500. All the light sports will do that. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 05/05/07 17:30, Margy Natalie wrote:
Newps wrote: Why can't you putz around with it locally? Around the local area I can run my Bo at 45% power on 8 gph indicating 145-150 mph. You'll never come out ahead adding an LSA with those numbers. 145-150 isn't putzing. I want slow, lazy, weekend hanging out. Powered Parachute would be fun too, but those can't take any wind at all. The FIB looks like fun as well. I'd prefer nothing between me and the air. Then have a look at the Quicksilver ultralight. This was the first ultralight I trained in (actually, I trained in the model MX-II, which was a two-seat fat UL trainer). Quite honestly, I've never had as much fun flying that I did in that airplane er... vehicle ;-) Margy -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane, USUA Ultralight Pilot Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Beginning Of The End Of Airline Transportation? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | October 7th 06 11:17 AM |
| Beginning Flying Questions | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | June 3rd 06 12:15 AM |
| Beginning IFR book? | John T | Piloting | 10 | November 28th 05 04:19 AM |
| Did I hurt my alternator? | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 5 | October 24th 04 05:21 AM |
| Are we beginning to see the secondaries? Libya to abandom WMD | John Keeney | Military Aviation | 61 | January 1st 04 10:58 AM |